DejaVuzz: Disclosing Transient Execution Bugs with Dynamic Swappable Memory and Differential Information Flow Tracking Assisted Processor Fuzzing
Jinyan Xu, Yangye Zhou, Xingzhi Zhang, Yinshuai Li, Qinhan Tan, Yinqian Zhang, Yajin Zhou, Rui Chang, Wenbo Shen
摘要
Transient execution vulnerabilities have emerged as a critical threat to modern processors. Hardware fuzzing testing techniques have recently shown promising results in discovering transient execution bugs in large-scale out-of-order processor designs. However, their poor microarchitectural controllability and observability prevent them from effectively and efficiently detecting transient execution vulnerabilities.
This paper proposes DejaVuzz, a novel pre-silicon stage processor transient execution bug fuzzer. DejaVuzz utilizes two innovative operating primitives: dynamic swappable memory and differential information flow tracking, enabling more effective and efficient transient execution vulnerability detection. The dynamic swappable memory enables the isolation of different instruction streams within the same address space. Leveraging this capability, DejaVuzz generates targeted training for arbitrary transient windows and eliminates ineffective training, enabling efficient triggering of diverse transient windows. The differential information flow tracking aids in observing the propagation of sensitive data across the microarchitecture. Based on taints, DejaVuzz designs the taint coverage matrix to guide mutation and uses taint liveness annotations to identify exploitable leakages. Our evaluation shows that DejaVuzz outperforms the state-of-the-art fuzzer SpecDoctor, triggering more comprehensive transient windows with lower training overhead and achieving a 4.7× coverage improvement. And DejaVuzz also mitigates control flow over-tainting with acceptable overhead and identifies 5 previously undiscovered transient execution vulnerabilities (with 6 CVEs assigned) on BOOM and XiangShan.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper34
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 2,435 次
- Meltdown: Reading Kernel Memory from User SpaceMoritz Lipp, Michael Schwarz, Daniel Gruss, Thomas Prescher 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,456 次
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin 等USENIX Security 2018 · 被引用 1,175 次
- RIDL: Rogue In-Flight Data LoadStephan van Schaik, Alyssa Milburn, Sebastian Österlund, Pietro Frigo 等S&P 2019 · 被引用 408 次
- Fallout: Leaking Data on Meltdown-resistant CPUsClaudio Canella, Daniel Genkin, Lukas Giner, Daniel Gruss 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 289 次
相关 Paper
- Phantom Trails: Practical Pre-Silicon Discovery of Transient Data LeaksAlvise de Faveri Tron, Raphael Isemann, Hany Ragab, Cristiano Giuffrida 等USENIX Security 2025
- SpecDoctor: Differential Fuzz Testing to Find Transient Execution VulnerabilitiesJaewon Hur, Suhwan Song, Sunwoo Kim, Byoungyoung LeeCCS 2022 · 被引用 19 次
- Lost and Found in Speculation: Hybrid Speculative Vulnerability DetectionMohamadreza Rostami, Shaza Zeitouni, Rahul Kande, Chen Chen 等DAC 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- BPUFuzzer: Effective Fuzz Testing for Branching Transient Execution Vulnerabilities of RISC-V CPURihui Sun, Jin Wu, Hanyin Liu, Zikang Tao 等DAC 2025
- MileSan: Detecting Exploitable Microarchitectural Leakage via Differential Hardware-Software Taint TrackingTobias Kovats, Flavien Solt, Katharina Ceesay-Seitz, Kaveh RazaviCCS 2025
