Lune

CVPR2022顶会

Habitat-Web: Learning Embodied Object-Search Strategies from Human Demonstrations at Scale

Ram Ramrakhya, Eric Undersander, Dhruv Batra, Abhishek Das

2022年份
73被引次数
53顶会引用

摘要

We present a large-scale study of imitating human demonstrations on tasks that require a virtual robot to search for objects in new environments -(1) ObjectGoal Navigation (e.g. 'find & go to a chair') and ( 2) PICK&PLACE (e.g. 'find mug, pick mug, find counter, place mug on counter'). First, we develop a virtual teleoperation data-collection infrastructure -connecting Habitat simulator running in a web browser to Amazon Mechanical Turk, allowing remote users to teleoperate virtual robots, safely and at scale. We collect 80k demonstrations for OBJECTNAV and 12k demonstrations for PICK&PLACE, which is an order of magnitude larger than existing human demonstration datasets in simulation or on real robots. Our virtual teleoperation data contains 29.3M actions, and is equivalent to 22.6k hours of real-world teleoperation time, and illustrates rich, diverse strategies for solving the tasks. Second, we use this data to answer the question -how does large-scale imitation learning (IL) (which has not been hitherto possible) compare to reinforcement learning (RL) (which is the status quo)? On OBJECTNAV, we find that IL (with no bells or whistles) using 70k human demonstrations outperforms RL using 240k agent-gathered trajectories. This effectively establishes an 'exchange rate' -a single human demonstration appears to be worth ∼4 agent-gathered ones. More importantly, we find the IL-trained agent learns efficient object-search behavior from humans -it peeks into rooms, checks corners for small objects, turns in place to get a panoramic view -none of these are exhibited as prominently by the RL agent, and to induce these behaviors via contemporary RL techniques would require tedious reward engineering. Finally, accuracy vs. training data size plots show promising scaling behavior, suggesting that simply collecting more demonstrations is likely to advance the state of art further. On PICK&PLACE, the comparison is starker -IL agents achieve ∼18% success on episodes with new object-receptacle locations when trained with 9.5k human demonstrations, while RL agents fail to get beyond 0%. Overall, our work provides compelling evidence for investing in large-scale imitation learning. Project page: ram81.github.io/projects/habitat-web.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper53

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper14

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖