PRISM: Festina Lente Proactivity—Risk-Sensitive, Uncertainty-Aware Deliberation for Proactive Agents
Yuxuan Fu, Xiaoyu Tan, Teqi Hao, Chen Zhan, Xihe Qiu
摘要
Proactive agents must decide not only what to say but also whether and when to intervene. Many current systems rely on brittle heuristics or indiscriminate long reasoning, which offers little control over the benefit-burden tradeoff. We formulate the problem as cost-sensitive selective intervention and present PRISM, a novel framework that couples a decision-theoretic gate with a dual-process reasoning architecture. At inference time, the agent intervenes only when a calibrated probability of user acceptance exceeds a threshold derived from asymmetric costs of missed help and false alarms. Inspired by festina lente (Latin: "make haste slowly"), we gate by an acceptance-calibrated, cost-derived threshold and invoke a resource-intensive Slow mode with counterfactual checks only near the decision boundary, concentrating computation on ambiguous and high-stakes cases. Training uses gate-aligned, schema-locked distillation: a teacher running the full PRISM pipeline provides dense, executable supervision on unlabeled interaction traces, while the student learns a response policy that is explicitly decoupled from the intervention gate to enable tunable and auditable control. On PROACTIVEBENCH, PRISM reduces false alarms by 22.78% and improves F1 by 20.14% over strong baselines. These results show that principled decision-theoretic gating, paired with selective slow reasoning and aligned distillation, yields proactive agents that are precise, computationally efficient, and controllable. To facilitate reproducibility, we release our code, models, and resources at https://prism-festinalente.github.io/ ; all experiments use the open-source PROACTIVEBENCH benchmark.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,989 次
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 2,082 次
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu 等ACL 2023 · 被引用 540 次
- Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without PromptingXuezhi Wang, Denny ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 305 次
相关 Paper
- Distilling LLM Agent into Small Models with Retrieval and Code ToolsMinki Kang, Jongwon Jeong, Seanie Lee, Jaewoong Cho 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 51 次
- Intervene When It Doubts: Conjunction-Guided Interactive ReasoningQianyue Wang, Jinwu Hu, Yaofo Chen, Yufeng Wang 等ICML 2026
- Test-time Prompt InterventionChenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Mz Dai, Dingyu Yao 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 8 次
- Consolidation or Adaptation? PRISM: Disentangling SFT and RL Data via Gradient ConcentrationYang Zhao, Yangou Ouyang, Xiao Ding, Hepeng Wang 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive ThinkingWeiyang Huang, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Xinyang Chen 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 3 次
