Improving DBMS Scheduling Decisions with Accurate Performance Prediction on Concurrent Queries
Ziniu Wu, Markos Markakis, Chunwei Liu, Peter Baile Chen, Balakrishnan Narayanaswamy, Tim Kraska, Samuel Madden
摘要
Query scheduling is a critical task that directly impacts query performance in database management systems (DBMS). Deeply integrated schedulers, which require changes to DBMS internals, are usually customized for a specific engine and can take months to implement. In contrast, non-intrusive schedulers make coarse-grained decisions, such as controlling query admission and re-ordering query execution, without requiring modifications to DBMS internals. They require much less engineering effort and can be applied across a wide range of DBMS engines, offering immediate benefits to end users. However, most existing non-intrusive scheduling systems rely on simplified cost models and heuristics that cannot accurately model query interactions under concurrency and different system states, possibly leading to suboptimal scheduling decisions.
This work introduces IconqSched , a new, principled non-intrusive scheduler that optimizes the execution order and timing of queries to enhance total end-to-end runtime as experienced by the user — query queuing time plus system runtime. Unlike previous approaches, IconqSched features a novel predictor, Iconq , which treats the DBMS as a black box and accurately estimates the system runtime of concurrently executed queries under different system states. Using these predictions, IconqSched is able to capture system runtime variations across different query mixes and system loads. It then employs a greedy scheduling algorithm to effectively determine which queries to submit and when to submit them. We compare IconqSched to other schedulers in terms of end-to-end runtime using realistic workload traces. On Postgres, IconqSched reduces end-to-end runtime by up to 16.5% on average and 33.6% in the tail. Similarly, on Redshift, it reduces end-to-end runtime by up to 14.4% on average and 22.9% in the tail.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper16
- An End-to-End Learning-based Cost EstimatorJi Sun, Guoliang LiVLDB 2020 · 被引用 251 次
- Bao: Making Learned Query Optimization PracticalRyan Marcus, Parimarjan Negi, Hongzi Mao, Nesime Tatbul 等SIGMOD 2021 · 被引用 242 次
- Building An Elastic Query Engine on Disaggregated StorageMidhul Vuppalapati, Justin Miron, Rachit Agarwal, Dan Truong 等NSDI 2020 · 被引用 142 次
- QueryFormer: A Tree Transformer Model for Query Plan RepresentationYue Zhao, Gao Cong, Jiachen Shi, Chunyan MiaoVLDB 2022 · 被引用 117 次
- Balsa: Learning a Query Optimizer Without Expert DemonstrationsZongheng Yang, Wei-Lin Chiang, Sifei Luan, Gautam Mittal 等SIGMOD 2022 · 被引用 99 次
相关 Paper
- LSched: A Workload-Aware Learned Query Scheduler for Analytical Database SystemsIbrahim Sabek, Tenzin Samten Ukyab, Tim KraskaSIGMOD 2022 · 被引用 25 次
- Self-Tuning Query Scheduling for Analytical WorkloadsBenjamin Wagner, André Kohn, Thomas NeumannSIGMOD 2021 · 被引用 25 次
- BQSched: A Non-Intrusive Scheduler for Batch Concurrent Queries via Reinforcement LearningChenhao Xu, Chunyu Chen, Jinglin Peng, Jiannan Wang 等ICDE 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Laser: Buffer-Aware Learned Query Scheduling in Master-Standby DatabasesYuwei Huang, Guoliang LiVLDB 2025
- Query Performance Prediction for Concurrent Queries using Graph EmbeddingXuanhe Zhou, Ji Sun, Guoliang Li, Jianhua FengVLDB 2020 · 被引用 96 次
