Micro-bumping, Hybrid Bonding, or Monolithic? A PPA Study for Heterogeneous 3D IC Options
Jinwoo Kim, Lingjun Zhu, Hakki Mert Torun, Madhavan Swaminathan, Sung Kyu Lim
摘要
In this paper, we present three commercial-grade 3D IC designs based on state-of-the-art design technologies, specifically micro-bumping (3D die stacking), hybrid bonding (wafer-on-wafer bonding) and monolithic 3D IC (M3D). To highlight trade-offs present in these three designs, we perform analyses on power, performance, and area and the clock tree. We also model the tier-to-tier interconnection in each 3D IC methodology and analyze signal integrity to assess the reliability of each design. From our experiments, hybrid bonding design shows the best timing improvement of 81.4% when compared to its 2D counterpart, while micro-bumping shows the best reliability among 3D IC designs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Heterogeneous Monolithic 3D ICs: EDA Solutions, and Power, Performance, Cost TradeoffsSai Surya Kiran Pentapati, Sung Kyu LimDAC 2021 · 被引用 13 次
- Mixed-Size 3D Analytical Placement with Heterogeneous Technology NodesYan-Jen Chen, Cheng-Hsiu Hsieh, Po-Han Su, Shao-Hsiang Chen 等DAC 2024 · 被引用 8 次
- A High Level Approach to Co-Designing 3D ICsDaniel Xing, Ankur SrivastavaDAC 2024
- ML-based Physical Design Parameter Optimization for 3D ICs: From Parameter Selection to OptimizationHao-Hsiang Hsiao, Pruek Vanna-Iampikul, Yi-Chen Lu, Sung Kyu LimDAC 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- Glass Interposer Integration of Logic and Memory Chiplets: PPA and Power/Signal Integrity BenefitsPruek Vanna-Iampikul, Lingjun Zhu, Serhat Erdogan, Mohanalingam Kathaperumal 等DAC 2023 · 被引用 9 次
