Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank Alignment
Shriram Chennakesavalu, Frank Hu, Sebastian Ibarraran, Grant M. Rotskoff
摘要
Searching through chemical space is an exceptionally challenging problem because the number of possible molecules grows combinatorially with the number of atoms. Large, autoregressive models trained on databases of chemical compounds have yielded powerful generators, but we still lack robust strategies for generating molecules with desired properties. This molecular search problem closely resembles the "alignment" problem for large language models, though for many chemical tasks we have a specific and easily evaluable reward function. Here, we introduce an algorithm called energy rank alignment (ERA) that leverages an explicit reward function to produce a gradient-based objective that we use to optimize autoregressive policies. We show theoretically that this algorithm is closely related to proximal policy optimization (PPO) and direct preference optimization (DPO), but has a minimizer that converges to an ideal Gibbs-Boltzmann distribution with the reward playing the role of an energy function. Furthermore, this algorithm is highly scalable, does not require reinforcement learning, and performs well relative to DPO when the number of preference observations per pairing is small. We deploy this approach to align molecular transformers and protein language models to generate molecules and protein sequences, respectively, with externally specified properties and find that it does so robustly, searching through diverse parts of chemical space.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper5
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy DataFahim Tajwar, Anikait Singh, Archit Sharma, Rafael Rafailov 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 189 次
- Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward ModelingGaon An, Junhyeok Lee, Xingdong Zuo, Norio Kosaka 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 61 次
- Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference RankingsAngelica Chen, Sadhika Malladi, Lily H. Zhang, Xinyi Chen 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 60 次
相关 Paper
- Model-based reinforcement learning for biological sequence designChristof Angermüller, David Dohan, David Belanger, Ramya Deshpande 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 159 次
- TGDPO: Harnessing Token-Level Reward Guidance for Enhancing Direct Preference OptimizationMingkang Zhu, Xi Chen, Zhongdao Wang, Bei Yu 等ICML 2025
- DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHFHan Zhong, Zikang Shan, Guhao Feng, Wei Xiong 等ICML 2025
- Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE-Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMsArash Ahmadian, Chris Cremer, Matthias Gallé, Marzieh Fadaee 等ACL 2024 · 被引用 20 次
- Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive StudyShusheng Xu, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Wenjie Ye 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 274 次
