The Expressive Power of Transformers with Chain of Thought
William Merrill, Ashish Sabharwal
摘要
Recent theoretical work has identified surprisingly simple reasoning problems, such as checking if two nodes in a graph are connected or simulating finite-state machines, that are provably unsolvable by standard transformers that answer immediately after reading their input. However, in practice, transformers' reasoning can be improved by allowing them to use a "chain of thought" or "scratchpad", i.e., generate and condition on a sequence of intermediate tokens before answering. Motivated by this, we ask: Does such intermediate generation fundamentally extend the computational power of a decoder-only transformer? We show that the answer is yes, but the amount of increase depends crucially on the amount of intermediate generation. For instance, we find that transformer decoders with a logarithmic number of decoding steps (w.r.t. the input length) push the limits of standard transformers only slightly, while a linear number of decoding steps, assuming projected pre-norm (a slight generalization of standard pre-norm), adds a clear new ability (under standard complexity conjectures): recognizing all regular languages. Our results also imply that linear steps keep transformer decoders within context-sensitive languages, and polynomial steps with generalized pre-norm make them recognize exactly the class of polynomial-time solvable problems-the first exact characterization of a type of transformers in terms of standard complexity classes. Together, this provides a nuanced framework for understanding how the length of a transformer's chain of thought or scratchpad impacts its reasoning power.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper116
- Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause TokensSachin Goyal, Ziwei Ji, Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Krishna Menon 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 240 次
- Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language ModelsAsma Ghandeharioun, Avi Caciularu, Adam Pearce, Lucas Dixon 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 197 次
- The Pitfalls of Next-Token PredictionGregor Bachmann, Vaishnavh NagarajanICML 2024 · 被引用 163 次
- The Illusion of State in State-Space ModelsWilliam Merrill, Jackson Petty, Ashish SabharwalICML 2024 · 被引用 157 次
- RM-R1: Reward Modeling as ReasoningXiusi Chen, Gaotang Li, Ziqi Wang, Bowen Jin 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 147 次
它引用的顶会 Paper11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- On Layer Normalization in the Transformer ArchitectureRuibin Xiong, Yunchang Yang, Di He, Kai Zheng 等ICML 2020 · 被引用 1,388 次
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 728 次
- Towards Revealing the Mystery behind Chain of Thought: A Theoretical PerspectiveGuhao Feng, Bohang Zhang, Yuntian Gu, Haotian Ye 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 470 次
- How Language Model Hallucinations Can SnowballMuru Zhang, Ofir Press, William Merrill, Alisa Liu 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 406 次
相关 Paper
- A Little Depth Goes a Long Way: The Expressive Power of Log-Depth TransformersWilliam Merrill, Ashish SabharwalNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 62 次
- Chain of Thought Empowers Transformers to Solve Inherently Serial ProblemsZhiyuan Liu, Hong Liu, Denny Zhou, Tengyu MaICLR 2024 · 被引用 259 次
- Lower Bounds for Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Hard-Attention TransformersAlireza Amiri Bavandpour, Xinting Huang, Mark Rofin, Michael HahnICML 2025
- Can Transformers Reason Logically? A Study in SAT SolvingLeyan Pan, Vijay Ganesh, Jacob D. Abernethy, Chris Esposo 等ICML 2025
- Exact Expressive Power of Transformers with PaddingWilliam Merrill, Ashish SabharwalNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 21 次
