An almost 2-approximation for all-pairs of shortest paths in subquadratic time
Maor Akav, Liam Roditty
摘要
Let G = (V, E) be an unweighted undirected graph with n vertices and m edges. Dor, Halperin, and Zwick [FOCS 1996, SICOMP 2000] presented an Õ(n2)-time algorithm that computes estimated distances with a multiplicative approximation of 3. Berman and Kasiviswanathan [WADS 2007] improved the approximation of Dor et al. and presented an Õ(n2)-time algorithm that produces for every u, v ϵ V an estimate (u, v) such that: dG(u, v) ≤ (u, v) ≤ 2dG(u, v) + 1. We refer to such an approximation as an (α, β)-approximation, where a is the multiplicative approximation and β is the additive approximation. A prerequisite for an O(n2−ε)-time algorithm, where ε ϵ (0, 1), is a data structure that uses O(n2−δ) space, for some δ ≥ ε, and answers queries in constant time. An O(n2−ε)-time (3, 0)-approximation algorithm became plausible after Thorup and Zwick [STOC 2001, JACM 2005] presented their approximate distance oracles, and in particular an O(n1.5)-space data structure that reports a (3, 0)-approximate distance in O(1) time. Indeed, using Thorup and Zwick distance oracles together with more ideas, Baswana, Gaur, Sen, and Upadhyay [ICALP 2008] improved the running time of Dor et al., and obtained an O(n2−ε) time algorithm, at the cost of introducing also an additive approximation. They presented an algorithm that in Õ(m + n23/12) expected running time constructs an O(n1.5)-space data structure, that in O(1) time reports a (3, 14)-approximate distance. An O(n2−ε)-time (2, 1)-approximation algorithm became plausible only after Pǎtraşcu and Roditty [FOCS 2010, SICOMP 2014] presented an O(n5/3)-space data structure that reports (2, 1)-approximate distances in O(1) time. However, only few years ago, Sommer [ICALP 2016] obtained an Õ(n2) time algorithm that computes a (2, 1)-distance oracle with Õ(n5/3) space. This leads to the following natural question of whether Ω(n2) time is a lower bound for any (3−α, β)-approximation, where α ϵ (0, 1), and β is constant. In this paper we show that this is not the case by presenting an algorithm that for every ε ϵ (0, 1/2) computes in Õ(m) + n2−Ω(ε) time an -space data structure that in O(1/ε) time reports, for every u, v ϵ V, an estimate (u, v) such that: Our result improves, simultaneously, the running time and the multiplicative approximation of the Õ(n2)-time (3, 0)-approximation algorithm of Dor et al. at the cost of introducing also an additive approximation.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper5
- Stronger 3-SUM Lower Bounds for Approximate Distance Oracles via Additive CombinatoricsAmir Abboud, Karl Bringmann, Nick FischerSTOC 2023 · 被引用 10 次
- Faster Approximate All Pairs Shortest PathsBarna Saha, Christopher YeSODA 2024 · 被引用 3 次
- Improved Distance (Sensitivity) Oracles with Subquadratic SpaceDavide Bilò, Shiri Chechik, Keerti Choudhary, Sarel Cohen 等FOCS 2024 · 被引用 2 次
- Improved 2-Approximate Shortest Paths for close vertex pairsManoj GuptaFOCS 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- Fast 2-Approximate All-Pairs Shortest PathsMichal Dory, Sebastian Forster, Yael Kirkpatrick, Yasamin Nazari 等SODA 2024
相关 Paper
- Nearly 2-Approximate Distance Oracles in Subquadratic TimeShiri Chechik, Tianyi ZhangSODA 2022 · 被引用 5 次
- Optimal Approximate Distance Oracle for Planar GraphsHung Le, Christian Wulff-NilsenFOCS 2021 · 被引用 7 次
- New Algorithms for All Pairs Approximate Shortest PathsLiam RodittySTOC 2023
- Dynamic Deterministic Constant-Approximate Distance Oracles with nε Worst-Case Update TimeBernhard Haeupler, Yaowei Long, Thatchaphol SaranurakFOCS 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Fully-Dynamic All-Pairs Shortest Paths: Improved Worst-Case Time and Space BoundsMaximilian Probst Gutenberg, Christian Wulff-NilsenSODA 2020 · 被引用 19 次
