On Testing for Discrimination Using Causal Models
Hana Chockler, Joseph Y. Halpern
摘要
Consider a bank that uses an AI system to decide which loan applications to approve. We want to ensure that the system is fair, that is, it does not discriminate against applicants based on a predefined list of sensitive attributes, such as gender and ethnicity. We expect there to be a regulator whose job it is to certify the bank’s system as fair or unfair. We consider issues that the regulator will have to confront when making such a decision, including the precise definition of fairness, dealing with proxy variables, and dealing with what we call allowed variables, that is, variables such as salary on which the decision is allowed to depend, despite being correlated with sensitive variables. We show (among other things) that the problem of deciding fairness as we have defined it is co-NP-complete, but then argue that, despite that, in practice the problem should be manageable.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
相关 Paper
- Monitoring Algorithmic FairnessThomas A. Henzinger, Mahyar Karimi, Konstantin Kueffner, Kaushik MallikCAV 2023 · 被引用 13 次
- Causal Fairness for Outcome ControlDrago Plecko, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 17 次
- Fairness Shields: Safeguarding against Biased Decision MakersFilip Cano, Thomas A. Henzinger, Bettina Könighofer, Konstantin Kueffner 等AAAI 2025
- Learning Fair Naive Bayes Classifiers by Discovering and Eliminating Discrimination PatternsYooJung Choi, Golnoosh Farnadi, Behrouz Babaki, Guy Van den BroeckAAAI 2020 · 被引用 31 次
- Empirical Likelihood for Fair ClassificationPangpang Liu, Yichuan ZhaoICLR 2024 · 被引用 1 次
