RMath: A Logic Reasoning-Focused Datasets Toward Mathematical Multistep Reasoning Tasks
Ziyi Hu, Jun Liu, Zhongzhi Liu, Yuzhong Liu, Zheng Xie, Yiping Song
摘要
Mathematical reasoning ability objectively reflects a language model's understanding of implicit knowledge in contexts, with logic being a prerequisite for exploring, articulating and establishing effective reasoning. Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in complex reasoning tasks represented by mathematical reasoning. However, existing mathematical datasets either focus on commonsense reasoning, assessing the model's knowledge application ability, or arithmetic problems with fixed calculation rules, evaluating the model's rapid learning capability. There is a lack of datasets that require solving problems solely through logical reasoning. As a result, the performance of LLMs in accurately understanding the implicit logical relationships in problems and deriving conclusions based solely on given conditions is hindered. To address this challenge, we construct a dataset specifically for multiple step reasoning tasks: Reasoning-Math (RMath). This dataset focuses on evaluating logical reasoning abilities with mathematical reasoning problems, covering typical problem types, including direct reasoning problems, hypothetical reasoning problems, and nested reasoning problems. Additionally, we design a standardized annotation scheme that transforms natural language descriptions of conditions into formal propositions. Other annotation contents include problem categories, proposition truth values, and proposition relationship types. This not only reduces biases caused by semantic misunderstandings during problem-solving, but also facilitates the incorporation of theoretically grounded logical reasoning methods to enhance reasoning abilities. Furthermore, we propose a normalization problem-solving framework based on propositional logic for RMath and design the problem-solving process for prompt tuning to guide LLMs to absorb mathematical logical theories and improving reasoning abilities. Finally, we evaluate RMath on several popular LLMs and present the corresponding results.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper9
- MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual ContextsPan Lu, Hritik Bansal, Tony Xia, Jiacheng Liu 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,472 次
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language ModelsLonghui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 637 次
- miniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicsKunhao Zheng, Jesse Michael Han, Stanislas PoluICLR 2022 · 被引用 342 次
- ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem SolvingZhibin Gou, Zhihong Shao, Yeyun Gong, Yelong Shen 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 289 次
- Dynamic Prompt Learning via Policy Gradient for Semi-structured Mathematical ReasoningPan Lu, Liang Qiu, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 41 次
相关 Paper
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 被引用 38 次
- Multi-LogiEval: Towards Evaluating Multi-Step Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language ModelsNisarg Patel, Mohith Kulkarni, Mihir Parmar, Aashna Budhiraja 等EMNLP 2024 · 被引用 6 次
- CogMath: Assessing LLMs' Authentic Mathematical Ability from a Human Cognitive PerspectiveJiayu Liu, Zhenya Huang, Wei Dai, Cheng Cheng 等ICML 2025
- LogicTree: Improving Complex Reasoning of LLMs via Instantiated Multi-step Synthetic Logical DataZehao Wang, Lin F. Yang, Jie Wang, Kehan Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language ModelsMihir Parmar, Nisarg Patel, Neeraj Varshney, Mutsumi Nakamura 等ACL 2024
