Finding and Reactivating Post-Trained LLMs' Hidden Safety Mechanisms
Mingjie Li, Wai Man Si, Michael Backes, Yang Zhang, Yisen Wang
摘要
Despite the impressive performance of general-purpose large language models (LLMs), they often require fine-tuning or post-training to excel at specific tasks. For instance, large reasoning models (LRMs), such as the DeepSeek-R1 series, demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities after post-training different general large language models on diverse chain-of-thought (CoT) datasets. However, this additional training frequently comes at the cost of reduced safety, as the fine-tuned or post-trained models tend to exhibit more harmful behaviors compared with the regular LLMs before post-training or fine-tuning, potentially leading to harmful outcomes due to their enhanced capabilities. Taking LRMs as an example, we first investigate the underlying cause of this safety degradation in this paper. Our analysis reveals that post-training can mask the original safety mechanisms of the base LLM, while over-amplifying representations related to their post-training ability. But luckily, we also find that LRMs' safety mechanisms still exist instead of being removed during their post-training. Based on these findings, we propose a lightweight and cost-effective solution called SafeReAct that restores the suppressed safety behaviors by aligning with LoRA adapters on a few layers. Experiments on four state-of-the-art LRMs show that our method significantly improves safety on harmful prompts without compromising reasoning performance. Besides LRMs, additional results on other domain-specific LLMs, like medical models, further confirm the generality and effectiveness of our approach. Code is available at https://github.com/homles11/SafeReAct.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Adjacent Words, Divergent Intents: Jailbreaking Large Language Models via Task ConcurrencyYukun Jiang, Mingjie Li, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 17 次
- Pruning Unsafe Tickets: A Resource-Efficient Framework for Safer and More Robust LLMsWai Man Si, Mingjie Li, Michael Backes, Yang ZhangACL 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper26
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 3,045 次
- Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Tinghao Xie, Pin-Yu Chen 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,104 次
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 1,072 次
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 1,031 次
相关 Paper
- SAFEPATH: Preventing Harmful Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought via Early AlignmentWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Minsuk Kahng, Albert NoNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 31 次
- Reasoning Structure Matters for Safety Alignment of Reasoning ModelsYeonjun In, Wonjoong Kim, Sangwu Park, Chanyoung ParkACL 2026
- How Should We Enhance the Safety of Large Reasoning Models: An Empirical StudyZhexin Zhang, Xian Qi Loye, Victor Shea-Jay Huang, Junxiao Yang 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 20 次
- Reasoning Model Unlearning: Forgetting Traces, Not Just Answers, While Preserving Reasoning SkillsChangsheng Wang, Chongyu Fan, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia 等EMNLP 2025
- Teach to Reason Safely: Policy-Guided Safety Tuning for MLRMsJingyu Zhang, Kun Yang, Ming Wen, Zhuoer Xu 等ICLR 2026
