GateBreaker: Gate-Guided Attacks on Mixture-of-Expert LLMs
Lichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami, Stjepan Picek, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi
摘要
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have advanced the scaling of Large Language Models (LLMs) by activating only a sparse subset of parameters per input, enabling state-of-the-art performance with reduced computational cost. As these models are increasingly deployed in critical domains, understanding and strengthening their alignment mechanisms is essential to prevent harmful outputs. However, existing LLM safety research has focused almost exclusively on dense architectures, leaving the unique safety properties of MoEs largely unexamined. The modular, sparsely-activated design of MoEs suggests that safety mechanisms may operate differently than in dense models, raising questions about their robustness. In this paper, we present GateBreaker, the first training-free, lightweight, and architecture-agnostic attack framework that compromises the safety alignment of modern MoE LLMs at inference time. GateBreaker operates in three stages: (i) gate-level profiling , which identifies safety experts disproportionately routed on harmful inputs, (ii) expert-level localization , which localizes the safety structure within safety experts, and (iii) targeted safety removal , which disables the identified safety structure to compromise the safety alignment. Our study shows that MoE safety concentrates within a small subset of neurons coordinated by sparse routing. Selective disabling of these neurons, maximum 2.9% of neurons in the targeted expert layers, significantly increases the averaged attack success rate (ASR) from 7.4% to 64.9% against the eight latest aligned MoE LLMs with limited utility degradation. These safety neurons transfer across models within the same family, raising ASR from 17.9% to 67.7% with one-shot transfer attack. Furthermore, GateBreaker generalizes to five MoE vision language models (VLMs) with 60.9% ASR on unsafe image inputs. To our knowledge, no prior work achieves this level of efficacy against MoE LLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- GoodVibe: Security-by-Vibe for LLM-Based Code GenerationMaximilian Thang, Lichao Wu, Sasha Behrouzi, Mohamadreza Rostami 等USENIX Security 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- SEAL: Reinforcing Global Safety in Mixture-of-Experts through Shared Expert ALignmentQingyu Meng, Yiwei Zha, Jiahuan Pei, Koen Hindriks 等CCS 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 被引用 3,037 次
- Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 2,230 次
相关 Paper
- MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized ExpertiseYitong Sun, Yao Huang, Teng Li, Ranjie Duan 等ICML 2026
- Sparse Models, Sparse Safety: Unsafe Routes in Mixture-of-Experts LLMsYukun Jiang, Hai Huang, Mingjie Li, Yage Zhang 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 9 次
- SafeMoE: Safe Fine-Tuning for MoE LLMs by Aligning Harmful Input RoutingJaehan Kim, Minkyoo Song, Seungwon Shin, Sooel SonICLR 2026
- Who Speaks for the Trigger? Dynamic Expert Routing in Backdoored Mixture-of-Experts TransformersXin Zhao, Xiaojun Chen, Bingshan Liu, Haoyu Gao 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- SAFEx: Analyzing Vulnerabilities of MoE-Based LLMs via Stable Safety-critical Expert IdentificationZhenglin Lai, Mengyao Liao, Bingzhe Wu, Dong Xu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 22 次
