DRMiner: Extracting Latent Design Rationale from Jira Issue Logs
Jiuang Zhao, Zitian Yang, Li Zhang, Xiaoli Lian, Donghao Yang, Xin Tan
摘要
Software architectures are usually meticulously designed to address multiple quality concerns and support long-term maintenance. However, there may be a lack of motivation for developers to document design rationales (i.e., the design alternatives and the underlying arguments for making or rejecting decisions) when they will not gain immediate benefit, resulting in a lack of standard capture of these rationales. With the turnover of developers, the architecture inevitably becomes eroded. This issue has motivated a number of studies to extract design knowledge from open-source communities in recent years. Unfortunately, none of the existing research has successfully extracted solutions alone with their corresponding arguments due to challenges such as the intricate semantics of online discussions and the lack of benchmarks for design rationale extraction.
问问这篇 Paper
问问你的智能体。
Lune 读过与它相关的顶会 Paper,每个回答都会注明依据哪几篇。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Automated Extraction and Analysis of Developer's Rationale in Open Source SoftwareMouna Dhaouadi, Bentley Oakes, Michalis FamelisFSE 2025
- Extracting Rationale for Open Source Software Development Decisions - A Study of Python Email ArchivesPankajeshwara Nand Sharma, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Nigel StangerICSE 2021 · 被引用 4 次
- ArguLens: Anatomy of Community Opinions On Usability Issues Using Argumentation ModelsWenting Wang, Deeksha M. Arya, Nicole Novielli, Jinghui Cheng 等CHI 2020 · 被引用 29 次
- On the relationship between design discussions and design quality: a case study of Apache projectsUmme Ayda Mannan, Iftekhar Ahmed, Carlos Jensen, Anita SarmaFSE 2020 · 被引用 15 次
- "That's dastardly ingenious": Ethical Argumentation Strategies on RedditColin M. Gray, Shruthi Sai ChivukulaCSCW 2021 · 被引用 8 次
