HarnessLLM: Rust Verification Harness Generation with Large Language Models
Minghua Wang, Yuwei Liu, Lin Huang
摘要
Rust's ownership and type system offer strong memory safety guarantees, but unsafe code and runtime panics still present significant risks. Formal verification is essential to ensure memory safety, but developing verification harnesses remains a challenging and manual task. Although large language models (LLMs) have shown strong performance in various code analysis tasks, directly applying them to harness generation often results in inaccurate API invocations, inefficient nondeterministic data generation, and fabricated fixes.
In this paper, we present HarnessLLM, an automated workflow that leverages LLMs to generate verification harnesses for Rust code directly from existing test suites. HarnessLLM automatically extracts calling scenarios from test cases, generates nondeterministic arguments based on dependency analysis, and incrementally synthesizes harnesses. It then iteratively refines the harnesses, preserving critical code regions and reporting fabricated types or functions to LLMs for correction. In our evaluation on 9 real-world Rust codebases, HarnessLLM extracted 294 calling scenarios from 494 test cases with 94.66% precision and generated harnesses for all scenarios in an average of 145 seconds each. It outperformed the existing approach, Autoharness, which succeeded on only 41% of those scenarios. Finally, 6 real-world memory safety bugs were detected using the generated harnesses, demonstrating the practical utility of our approach in verification. To our knowledge, this is the first work to use LLMs for generating harnesses aimed at memory safety verification in real-world Rust projects.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper21
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu 等ICLR 2022 · 被引用 4,966 次
- CodaMosa: Escaping Coverage Plateaus in Test Generation with Pre-trained Large Language ModelsCaroline Lemieux, Jeevana Priya Inala, Shuvendu K. Lahiri, Siddhartha SenICSE 2023 · 被引用 221 次
- Prompting Is All You Need: Automated Android Bug Replay with Large Language ModelsSidong Feng, Chunyang ChenICSE 2024 · 被引用 143 次
相关 Paper
- deepSURF: Detecting Memory Safety Vulnerabilities in Rust Through Fuzzing LLM-Augmented HarnessesGeorgios C. Androutsopoulos, Antonio BianchiS&P 2026 · 被引用 5 次
- KaPilot: LLM-Assisted Generation of Kani Specifications for Unsafe Rust VerificationMinghua Wang, Yuxi Ling, Mingzhi Gao, Yuwei Liu 等ISSTA 2026
- RustAssure: Differential Symbolic Testing for LLM-Transpiled C-to-Rust CodeYubo Bai, Tapti PalitASE 2025 · 被引用 8 次
- Automated Proof Generation for Rust Code via Self-EvolutionTianyu Chen, Shuai Lu, Shan Lu, Yeyun Gong 等ICLR 2025
- RustAssistant: Using LLMs to Fix Compilation Errors in Rust CodePantazis Deligiannis, Akash Lal, Nikita Mehrotra, Rishi Poddar 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 6 次
