StepFly: Agentic Troubleshooting Guide Automation for Incident Diagnosis
Jiayi Mao, Liqun Li, Yanjie Gao, Zegang Peng, Shilin He, Chaoyun Zhang, Si Qin, Samia Khalid, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Sitaram Lanka, Dongmei Zhang
摘要
Effective incident management in large-scale IT systems relies on troubleshooting guides (TSGs), but their manual execution is slow and error-prone. While recent advances in LLMs offer promise for automating incident management tasks, existing LLM-based solutions lack specialized support for several key challenges, including managing TSG quality issues, interpreting complex control flow, handling data-intensive queries, and exploiting execution parallelism. We first conducted an empirical study on 92 real-world TSGs, and, guided by our findings, we present StepFly, a novel end-to-end agentic framework for troubleshooting guide automation. Our approach features a three-stage workflow: the first stage provides a comprehensive guide together with a tool, TSG Mentor, to assist site reliability engineers (SREs) in improving TSG quality; the second stage performs offline preprocessing using LLMs to extract structured execution directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) from unstructured TSGs and to create dedicated Query Preparation Plugins (QPPs); and the third stage executes online using a DAG-guided scheduler-executor framework with a memory system to ensure correct workflow and support parallel execution of independent steps. Our empirical evaluation on a collection of real-world TSGs and incidents demonstrates that StepFly achieves a ∼94% success rate on GPT-4.1, outperforming baselines with less time and token consumption. Furthermore, it achieves a remarkable execution time reduction of 32.9% to 70.4% for parallelizable TSGs. Our code and sample data are publicly available at https://github.com/microsoft/StepFly.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 5,989 次
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM AgentsXingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 436 次
- Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without PromptingXuezhi Wang, Denny ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 305 次
- Automatic Root Cause Analysis via Large Language Models for Cloud IncidentsYinfang Chen, Huaibing Xie, Minghua Ma, Yu Kang 等EuroSys 2024 · 被引用 175 次
相关 Paper
- Xpert: Empowering Incident Management with Query Recommendations via Large Language ModelsYuxuan Jiang, Chaoyun Zhang, Shilin He, Zhihao Yang 等ICSE 2024 · 被引用 24 次
- LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Collaboration for Intelligent Industrial On-Call AutomationRuowei Fu, Yang Zhang, Zeyu Che, Xin Wu 等ASE 2025
- TSGuard: Automated User-Centric Incident Diagnosis for AI Workloads in the CloudYitao Yang, Yangtao Deng, Yifan Xiong, Baochun Li 等FSE 2026
- MAGIS: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework for GitHub Issue ResolutionWei Tao, Yucheng Zhou, Yanlin Wang, Wenqiang Zhang 等NeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 210 次
- Recommending Root-Cause and Mitigation Steps for Cloud Incidents using Large Language ModelsToufique Ahmed, Supriyo Ghosh, Chetan Bansal, Thomas Zimmermann 等ICSE 2023 · 被引用 93 次
