Incentivizing Consistent, Effective and Scalable Reasoning Capability in Audio LLMs via Reasoning Process Rewards
Jiajun Fan, Roger Ren, Jingyuan Li, Rahul Pandey, Prashanth Gurunath Shivakumar, Ivan Bulyko, Ankur Gandhe, Ge Liu, Yile Gu
摘要
The role of reasoning in Audio Large Language Models remains widely underexplored, as introducing a reasoning process often degrades rather than improves performance during inference, a phenomenon we term test-time inverse scaling, where longer reasoning chains yield progressively worse results. We demonstrate that this stems not from fundamental limitations of reasoning itself, but from inadequate training: models without proper guidance for the reasoning process produce hallucinatory, inconsistent reasoning that accumulates errors over longer chains. To address these challenges, we introduce CESAR (Consistent, Effective, and Scalable Audio Reasoners), shifting from outcome verification to rewarding the reasoning process. Our online reinforcement learning framework employs Group Relative Policy Optimization with a multi-faceted reward suite that incentivizes not only correctness and format but also consistency, structured analytical patterns, causal reasoning, domain-knowledge integration, and calibrated reasoning depth. CESAR resolves test-time inverse scaling, transforming reasoning from detriments into gains while revealing model-specific "reasoning sweet spots", where performance peaks during test-time scaling. We achieve state-of-the-art results on MMAU Test-mini, substantially outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o Audio, and near-human-level performance on MMSU reasoning tasks. Through AI-as-judge evaluations and qualitative comparisons, we provide both quantitative and qualitative validation of our improved reasoning quality. Importantly, enhanced reasoning creates synergistic effects, simultaneously improving multimodal reasoning and perception capabilities. Overall, CESAR establishes a principled method for developing robust and scalable reasoning in Audio LLMs.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language ModelsChangli Tang, Wenyi Yu, Guangzhi Sun, Xianzhao Chen 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 557 次
- Pengi: An Audio Language Model for Audio TasksSoham Deshmukh, Benjamin Elizalde, Rita Singh, Huaming WangNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 352 次
- Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language ModelsSreyan Ghosh, Arushi Goel, Jaehyeon Kim, Sonal Kumar 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 299 次
- Listen, Think, and UnderstandYuan Gong, Hongyin Luo, Alexander H. Liu, Leonid Karlinsky 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 247 次
相关 Paper
- Audio-Reasoner: Improving Reasoning Capability in Large Audio Language ModelsZhifei Xie, Mingbao Lin, Zihang Liu, Pengcheng Wu 等EMNLP 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- Audio-Thinker: Guiding Large Audio Language Model When and How to Think via Reinforcement LearningShu Wu, Chenxing Li, Wenfu Wang, Hao Zhang 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 4 次
- Unlocking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Process Reward ModelRuilin Luo, Zhuofan Zheng, Lei Wang, Yifan Wang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 38 次
- AuTAgent: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Tool-Augmented Audio ReasoningSiqian Tong, Xuan Li, Yiwei Wang, Baolong Bi 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 3 次
- When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMsYuyang Wu, Yifei Wang, Ziyu Ye, Tianqi Du 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 225 次
