Security Analysis of the MLS Key Derivation
Chris Brzuska, Eric Cornelissen, Konrad Kohbrok
摘要
Cryptographic communication protocols provide confidentiality, integrity and authentication properties for end-to-end communication under strong corruption attacks, including, notably, post-compromise security (PCS). Most protocols are designed for one-to-one communication. Protocols for group communication are less common, less efficient, and tend to provide weaker security guarantees. This is because group communication poses unique challenges, such as coordinated key updates, changes to group membership and complex post-compromise recovery procedures. We need to tackle this complex challenge as a community. Thus, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has created a working group with the goal of developing a sound standard for a continuous asynchronous key-exchange protocol for dynamic groups that is secure and remains efficient for large group sizes. The current version of the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) security protocol is in a feature freeze, i.e., no changes are made in order to provide a stable basis for cryptographic analysis. The key schedule and TreeKEM design are of particular concern since they are crucial to distribute and combine several keys to achieve PCS. In this work, we study the MLS continuous group key derivation (CGKD) which comprises the MLS key schedule, TreeKEM and their composition, as specified in Draft 11 of the MLS RFC, while abstracting away signatures, message flow and authentication guarantees. We establish the uniqueness and key indistinguishability properties of the MLS CGKD as computational security properties.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper8
- On the Insider Security of MLSJoël Alwen, Daniel Jost, Marta MularczykCRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 28 次
- When Messages Are Keys: Is HMAC a Dual-PRF?Matilda Backendal, Mihir Bellare, Felix Günther, Matteo ScarlataCRYPTO 2023 · 被引用 14 次
- TreeKEM: A Modular Machine-Checked Symbolic Security Analysis of Group Key Agreement in Messaging Layer SecurityThéophile Wallez, Jonathan Protzenko, Karthikeyan BhargavanS&P 2025
- Cryptographic Administration for Secure Group MessagingDavid Balbás, Daniel Collins, Serge VaudenayUSENIX Security 2023
- TreeSync: Authenticated Group Management for Messaging Layer SecurityThéophile Wallez, Jonathan Protzenko, Benjamin Beurdouche, Karthikeyan BhargavanUSENIX Security 2023
它引用的顶会 Paper3
- On Ends-to-Ends Encryption: Asynchronous Group Messaging with Strong Security GuaranteesKatriel Cohn-Gordon, Cas Cremers, Luke Garratt, Jon Millican 等CCS 2018 · 被引用 140 次
- Keep the Dirt: Tainted TreeKEM, Adaptively and Actively Secure Continuous Group Key AgreementKaren Klein, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Michael Walter, Chethan Kamath 等S&P 2021 · 被引用 46 次
- On the Insider Security of MLSJoël Alwen, Daniel Jost, Marta MularczykCRYPTO 2022 · 被引用 28 次
相关 Paper
- Quarantined-TreeKEM: A Continuous Group Key Agreement for MLS, Secure in Presence of Inactive UsersCéline Chevalier, Guirec Lebrun, Ange Martinelli, Abdul Rahman TalebCCS 2024 · 被引用 1 次
- Security Analysis and Improvements for the IETF MLS Standard for Group MessagingJoël Alwen, Sandro Coretti, Yevgeniy Dodis, Yiannis TselekounisCRYPTO 2020 · 被引用 91 次
- Modular Design of Secure Group Messaging Protocols and the Security of MLSJoël Alwen, Sandro Coretti, Yevgeniy Dodis, Yiannis TselekounisCCS 2021 · 被引用 1 次
- Continuous Group-Key Agreement: Concurrent Updates Without PruningBenedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Boran Erol, Krzysztof PietrzakCRYPTO 2025 · 被引用 2 次
- ETK: External-Operations TreeKEM and the Security of MLS in RFC 9420Cas Cremers, Esra Günsay, Vera Wesselkamp, Mang ZhaoEUROCRYPT 2026 · 被引用 1 次
