Mindful Explanations: Prevalence and Impact of Mind Attribution in XAI Research
Susanne Hindennach, Lei Shi, Filip Miletic, Andreas Bulling
摘要
Fig. 1. We study whether XAI researchers attribute a mind to AI systems by using mental verbs like "to think" in their explanations, which might result in users perceiving AI systems as mindful, independent agents. We investigate this impact in a vignette-based experiment and find that users rate the system's awareness higher, and consequently hold the AI system responsible even after considering the responsibility of AI experts.
When users perceive AI systems as mindful, independent agents, they hold them responsible instead of the AI experts who created and designed these systems. So far, it has not been studied whether explanations support this shift in responsibility through the use of mind-attributing verbs like "to think". To better understand the prevalence of mind-attributing explanations we analyse AI explanations in 3,533 explainable AI (XAI) research articles from the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC). Using methods from semantic shift detection, we identify three dominant types of mind attribution: (1) metaphorical (e.g. "to learn" or "to predict"), (2) awareness (e.g. "to consider"), and (3) agency (e.g. "to make decisions"). We then analyse the impact of mind-attributing explanations on awareness and responsibility in a vignette-based experiment with 199 participants. We find that participants who were given a mind-attributing explanation were more likely to rate the AI system as aware of the harm it caused. Moreover, the mind-attributing explanation had a responsibilityconcealing effect: Considering the AI experts' involvement lead to reduced ratings of AI responsibility for participants who were given a non-mind-attributing or no explanation. In contrast, participants who read the mind-attributing explanation still held the AI system responsible despite considering the AI experts' involvement. Taken together, our work underlines the need to carefully phrase explanations about AI systems in scientific writing to reduce mind attribution and clearly communicate human responsibility.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models; Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms; • Computing methodologies → Theory of mind.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper11
- What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design ConsiderationsDuri Long, Brian MagerkoCHI 2020 · 被引用 2,947 次
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl 等CHI 2021 · 被引用 505 次
- S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research CorpusKyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Mark Neumann, Rodney Kinney 等ACL 2020 · 被引用 424 次
- Analysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word RepresentationsMario Giulianelli, Marco Del Tredici, Raquel FernándezACL 2020 · 被引用 118 次
- Human Perceptions on Moral Responsibility of AI: A Case Study in AI-Assisted Bail Decision-MakingGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Meeyoung ChaCHI 2021 · 被引用 71 次
相关 Paper
- Guilty Artificial Minds: Folk Attributions of Mens Rea and Culpability to Artificially Intelligent AgentsMichael T. Stuart, Markus KneerCSCW 2021 · 被引用 48 次
- Mitigating Gender Stereotypes Toward AI Agents Through an eXplainable AI (XAI) ApproachWen Duan, Nathan J. McNeese, Guo Freeman, Lingyuan LiCSCW 2024 · 被引用 16 次
- Blaming Humans and Machines: What Shapes People's Reactions to Algorithmic HarmGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Meeyoung ChaCHI 2023 · 被引用 30 次
- Responsibility Attribution in Human Interactions with Everyday AI SystemsJoe Brailsford, Frank Vetere, Eduardo VellosoCHI 2025 · 被引用 10 次
- "It's Not the AI's Fault Because It Relies Purely on Data": How Causal Attributions of AI Decisions Shape Trust in AI SystemsSaumya Pareek, Sarah Schömbs, Eduardo Velloso, Jorge GonçalvesCHI 2025 · 被引用 14 次
