Lune

CSCW2024顶会

Mindful Explanations: Prevalence and Impact of Mind Attribution in XAI Research

Susanne Hindennach, Lei Shi, Filip Miletic, Andreas Bulling

2024年份
7被引次数
1顶会引用

摘要

Fig. 1. We study whether XAI researchers attribute a mind to AI systems by using mental verbs like "to think" in their explanations, which might result in users perceiving AI systems as mindful, independent agents. We investigate this impact in a vignette-based experiment and find that users rate the system's awareness higher, and consequently hold the AI system responsible even after considering the responsibility of AI experts.

When users perceive AI systems as mindful, independent agents, they hold them responsible instead of the AI experts who created and designed these systems. So far, it has not been studied whether explanations support this shift in responsibility through the use of mind-attributing verbs like "to think". To better understand the prevalence of mind-attributing explanations we analyse AI explanations in 3,533 explainable AI (XAI) research articles from the Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus (S2ORC). Using methods from semantic shift detection, we identify three dominant types of mind attribution: (1) metaphorical (e.g. "to learn" or "to predict"), (2) awareness (e.g. "to consider"), and (3) agency (e.g. "to make decisions"). We then analyse the impact of mind-attributing explanations on awareness and responsibility in a vignette-based experiment with 199 participants. We find that participants who were given a mind-attributing explanation were more likely to rate the AI system as aware of the harm it caused. Moreover, the mind-attributing explanation had a responsibilityconcealing effect: Considering the AI experts' involvement lead to reduced ratings of AI responsibility for participants who were given a non-mind-attributing or no explanation. In contrast, participants who read the mind-attributing explanation still held the AI system responsible despite considering the AI experts' involvement. Taken together, our work underlines the need to carefully phrase explanations about AI systems in scientific writing to reduce mind attribution and clearly communicate human responsibility.

CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → HCI theory, concepts and models; Collaborative and social computing theory, concepts and paradigms; • Computing methodologies → Theory of mind.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

引用它的顶会 Paper1

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper11

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖