PETS: A Principled Framework Towards Optimal Trajectory Allocation for Efficient Test-Time Self-Consistency
Zhangyi Liu, Huaizhi Qu, Xiaowei Yin, He Sun, Yanjun Han, Tianlong Chen, Xinyu Yang
摘要
Test-time scaling can improve model performance by aggregating stochastic reasoning trajectories. However, achieving sample-efficient test-time self-consistency under a limited budget remains an open challenge. We introduce PETS (Principled and Efficient Test-Time Self-Consistency), which initiates a principled study of trajectory allocation through an optimization framework. Central to our approach is the self-consistency rate, a new measure defined as agreement with the infinite-budget majority vote. This formulation makes sampleefficient test-time allocation theoretically grounded and amenable to rigorous analysis. We study both offline and online settings. In the offline regime, where all questions are known in advance, we connect trajectory allocation to crowdsourcing, a classic and well-developed area, by modeling reasoning traces as workers. This perspective allows us to leverage rich existing theory, yielding theoretical guarantees and an efficient majority-voting-based allocation algorithm. In the online streaming regime, where questions arrive sequentially and allocations must be made on the fly, we propose a novel method inspired by the offline framework. Our approach adapts budgets to question difficulty while preserving strong theoretical guarantees and computational efficiency. Experiments show that PETS consistently outperforms uniform allocation. On GPQA, PETS achieves perfect self-consistency in both settings while reducing the sampling budget by up to 75% (offline) and 55% (online) relative to uniform allocation. Code is available at: this https URL.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper7
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 22,562 次
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le 等ICLR 2023 · 被引用 681 次
- Deep Think with ConfidenceYichao Fu, Xuewei Wang, Hao Zhang, Yuandong Tian 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 171 次
- Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step ReasoningYiwei Li, Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Boyuan Pan 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 101 次
- Every Rollout Counts: Optimal Resource Allocation for Efficient Test-Time ScalingXinglin Wang, Yiwei Li, Shaoxiong Feng, Peiwen Yuan 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 16 次
相关 Paper
- Optimal Self-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning with Large Language ModelsAustin Feng, Marius Alonso, Ambroise Odonnat, Vasilii Feofanov 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 6 次
- Does Thinking More Always Help? Mirage of Test-Time Scaling in Reasoning ModelsSoumya Suvra Ghosal, Souradip Chakraborty, Avinash Reddy, Yifu Lu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 43 次
- Tracing the Traces: Latent Temporal Signals for Efficient and Accurate ReasoningMartina G. Vilas, Safoora Yousefi, Besmira Nushi, Eric Horvitz 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 12 次
- Slim-SC: Thought Pruning for Efficient Scaling with Self-ConsistencyColin Hong, Xu Guo, Anand Chaanan Singh, Esha Choukse 等EMNLP 2025
- Beyond Majority Voting: Self-Reflective Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningSitong Wu, Haoru Tan, Xichen Zhang, Bin Xia 等ICML 2026
