Practical and Accurate Local Edge Differentially Private Graph Algorithms
Pranay Mundra, Charalampos Papamanthou, Julian Shun, Quanquan C. Liu
摘要
The rise of massive networks across diverse domains necessitates sophisticated graph analytics, often involving sensitive data and raising privacy concerns. This paper addresses these challenges using local differential privacy (LDP), which enforces privacy at the individual level, where no third-party entity is trusted, unlike centralized models that assume a trusted curator. We introduce novel LDP algorithms for two fundamental graph statistics: 𝑘-core decomposition and triangle counting. Our approach leverages previously unexplored input-dependent private graph properties, specifically the degeneracy and maximum degree of the graph, to improve theoretical utility. Unlike prior methods, our error bounds are determined by the maximum degree rather than the total number of edges, resulting in significantly tighter theoretical guarantees. For triangle counting, we improve upon the previous work of Imola, Murakami, and Chaudhury [43, 44] , which bounds error in terms of the total number of edges. Instead, our algorithm achieves error bounds based on the graph's degeneracy by leveraging a differentially private out-degree orientation, a refined variant of Eden et al. 's randomized response technique [27] , and a novel, intricate analysis, yielding improved theoretical guarantees over prior state-of-the-art. Beyond theoretical improvements, we are the first to evaluate the practicality of local DP algorithms in a distributed simulation environment, unlike previous works that tested on a single processor. Our experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate substantial accuracy improvements, with our 𝑘-core decomposition achieving errors within 3x the exact values-far outperforming the 131x error in the baseline of Dhulipala et al. [19] . Additionally, our triangle counting algorithm reduces multiplicative approximation errors by up to six orders of magnitude compared to prior methods, all while maintaining competitive runtime performance.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
它引用的顶会 Paper20
- Generating Synthetic Decentralized Social Graphs with Local Differential PrivacyZhan Qin, Ting Yu, Yin Yang, Issa Khalil 等CCS 2017 · 被引用 266 次
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 被引用 139 次
- Analyzing Subgraph Statistics from Extended Local Views with Decentralized Differential PrivacyHaipei Sun, Xiaokui Xiao, Issa Khalil, Yin Yang 等CCS 2019 · 被引用 118 次
- Parallel Index-Based Structural Graph Clustering and Its ApproximationTom Tseng, Laxman Dhulipala, Julian ShunSIGMOD 2021 · 被引用 29 次
- Collecting Triangle Counts with Edge Relationship Local Differential PrivacyYuhan Liu, Suyun Zhao, Yixuan Liu, Dan Zhao 等ICDE 2022 · 被引用 28 次
相关 Paper
- Differential Privacy from Locally Adjustable Graph Algorithms: k-Core Decomposition, Low Out-Degree Ordering, and Densest SubgraphsLaxman Dhulipala, Quanquan C. Liu, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Jessica Shi 等FOCS 2022 · 被引用 24 次
- Robust Privacy-Preserving Triangle Counting under Edge Local Differential PrivacyYizhang He, Kai Wang, Wenjie Zhang, Xuemin Lin 等SIGMOD 2025 · 被引用 5 次
- Truss Decomposition Under Edge Local Differential PrivacyYuting Zhang, Wei Ni, Kai Wang, Yizhang He 等ICDE 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- Acyclic Graph Pattern Counting under Local Differential PrivacyYihua Hu, Kuncan Wang, Wei DongSIGMOD 2026
- Triangle Counting Over Signed Graphs with Differential PrivacyZening Li, Rong-Hua Li, Fusheng JinICDE 2025 · 被引用 1 次
