Lune

NDSS2019顶会

Quantity vs. Quality: Evaluating User Interest Profiles Using Ad Preference Managers

Muhammad Ahmad Bashir, Umar Farooq, Maryam Shahid, Muhammad Fareed Zaffar, Christo Wilson

2019年份
41被引次数
11顶会引用

摘要

Widely reported privacy issues concerning major online advertising platforms (e.g., Facebook) have heightened concerns among users about the data that is collected about them. However, while we have a comprehensive understanding who collects data on users, as well as how tracking is implemented, there is still a significant gap in our understanding: what information do advertisers actually infer about users, and is this information accurate? In this study, we leverage Ad Preference Managers (APMs) as a lens through which to address this gap. APMs are transparency tools offered by some advertising platforms that allow users to see the interest profiles that are constructed about them. We recruited 220 participants to install an IRB approved browser extension that collected their interest profiles from four APMs (Google, Facebook, Oracle BlueKai, and Neilsen eXelate), as well as behavioral and survey data. We use this data to analyze the size and correctness of interest profiles, compare their composition across the four platforms, and investigate the origins of the data underlying these profiles.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

lune papers fulltext 0cb22183-1cc8-4774-9b8f-e12fbaeeb0c1

引用它的顶会 Paper11

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper8

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖