Bayes Consistency vs. H-Consistency: The Interplay between Surrogate Loss Functions and the Scoring Function Class
Mingyuan Zhang, Shivani Agarwal
摘要
A fundamental question in multiclass classification concerns understanding the consistency properties of surrogate risk minimization algorithms, which minimize a (often convex) surrogate to the multiclass 0–1 loss. In particular, the framework of calibrated surrogates has played an important role in analyzing Bayes consistency of such algorithms, i.e. in studying convergence to a Bayes optimal classifier (Zhang, 2004; Tewari and Bartlett, 2007). However, follow-up work has suggested this framework can be of limited value when studying H-consistency; in particular, concerns have been raised that even when the data comes from an underlying linear model, minimizing certain convex calibrated surrogates over linear scoring functions fails to recover the true model (Long and Servedio, 2013). In this paper, we investigate this apparent conundrum. We find that while some calibrated surrogates can indeed fail to provide H-consistency when minimized over a naturallooking but naïvely chosen scoring function class F, the situation can potentially be remedied by minimizing them over a more carefully chosen class of scoring functions F. In particular, for the popular one-vs-all hinge and logistic surrogates, both of which are calibrated (and therefore provide Bayes consistency) under realizable models, but were previously shown to pose problems for realizable H-consistency, we derive a form of scoring function class F that enables Hconsistency. When H is the class of linear models, the class F consists of certain piecewise linear scoring functions that are characterized by the same number of parameters as in the linear case, and minimization over which can be performed using an adaptation of the min-pooling idea from neural network training. Our experiments confirm that the one-vs-all surrogates, when trained over this class of nonlinear scoring functions F, yield better linear multiclass classifiers than when trained over standard linear scoring functions.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper17
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and ApplicationsAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2023 · 被引用 790 次
- Two-Stage Learning to Defer with Multiple ExpertsAnqi Mao, Christopher Mohri, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 98 次
- H-Consistency Bounds for Surrogate Loss MinimizersPranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongICML 2022 · 被引用 50 次
- Multi-Class -Consistency BoundsPranjal Awasthi, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 48 次
- Realizable H-Consistent and Bayes-Consistent Loss Functions for Learning to DeferAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 37 次
相关 Paper
- Calibration and Consistency of Adversarial Surrogate LossesPranjal Awasthi, Natalie Frank, Anqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 59 次
- On the consistency of top-k surrogate lossesForest Yang, Sanmi KoyejoICML 2020 · 被引用 54 次
- Multi-Label Learning with Stronger Consistency GuaranteesAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 30 次
- Towards Consistency in Adversarial ClassificationLaurent Meunier, Raphael Ettedgui, Rafael Pinot, Yann Chevaleyre 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 12 次
- A Universal Growth Rate for Learning with Smooth Surrogate LossesAnqi Mao, Mehryar Mohri, Yutao ZhongNeurIPS 2024 · 被引用 27 次
