Lune

ICLR2026顶会

CMT-Benchmark: A Benchmark for Condensed Matter Theory Built by Expert Researchers

Haining Pan, James V. Roggeveen, Erez Berg, Juan Alvarez, Debanjan Chowdhury, Surya Ganguli, Federico Ghimenti, Juraj Hasik, Henry Hunt, Hong-Chen Jiang, Mason Kamb, Ying-Jer Kao

2026年份
6被引次数

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in coding and mathematical problem-solving; however, evaluation on advanced research-level problems in the hard sciences remains scarce. To fill this gap, we present , a dataset of 50 original problems covering condensed matter theory (CMT) at the level of an expert researcher. The solution for these problems involve analytical and computational approaches commonly used in quantum many-body physics and classical statistical mechanics. The dataset has been designed and verified by a worldwide panel of expert researchers through a collaborative environment. Topics in the dataset include Hartree-Fock mean-field theory, exact diagonalization methods, quantum Monte Carlo sampling, density matrix renormalization group, quantum statistical mechanics, classical statistical mechanics, and model building. We evaluate different LLMs by programmatically checking LLM-generated solutions against expert-supplied ground truth. To verify LLMs performance at scale, we developed an automated machine-grading pipeline suitable for advanced physics research problems. For example, we handle non-commuting operators that are essential for quantum many-body problems by symbolic manipulation and normal ordering. Our evaluations show that frontier models struggle with all of the problems in the dataset, highlighting a gap in the physical reasoning skills of current LLMs. Notably, experts identified strategies for creating increasingly difficult problems by interacting with the LLMs and exploiting common failure modes. While the highest-performing model, GPT5, correctly solves 30% of the problems, average performance across 17 models (GPT, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, and Llama classes) is only 11.4±\pm2.1%. Moreover, our benchmark contains 18 problems that not a single one of the 17 models considered here can correctly solve, and 26 problems that are solved by at most one model. These currently unsolvable problems span the fields of Quantum Monte Carlo, Variational Monte Carlo, and Density Matrix Renormalization Group. Furthermore, we illustrate how incorrect answers sometimes violate fundamental symmetries or have unphysical scaling dimensions. We believe that this benchmark set provides valuable guidance for the future development of language models, aiming to achieve the goal of AI research assistants and tutors.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

lune papers fulltext 069dc1ea-50d8-4bae-8fdc-e22f9435115b

它引用的顶会 Paper2

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖