IDE support for cloud-based static analyses
Linghui Luo, Martin Schäf, Daniel Sanchez, Eric Bodden
摘要
Integrating static analyses into continuous integration (CI) or continuous delivery (CD) has become the best practice for assuring code quality and security. Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools fit well into CI/CD, because CI/CD allows time for deep static analyses on large code bases and prevents vulnerabilities in the early stages of the development lifecycle. In CI/CD, the SAST tools usually run in the cloud and provide findings via a web interface. Recent studies show that developers prefer seeing the findings of these tools directly in their IDEs. Most tools with IDE integration run lightweight static analyses and can give feedback at coding time, but SAST tools used in CI/CD take longer to run and usually are not able to do so. Can developers interact directly with a cloud-based SAST tool that is typically used in CI/CD through their IDE? We investigated if such a mechanism can integrate cloud-based SAST tools better into a developers’ workflow than web-based solutions. We interviewed developers to understand their expectations from an IDE solution. Guided by these interviews, we implemented an IDE prototype for an existing cloud-based SAST tool. With a usability test using this prototype, we found that the IDE solution promoted more frequent tool interactions. In particular, developers performed code scans three times more often. This indicates better integration of the cloud-based SAST tool into developers’ workflow. Furthermore, while our study did not show statistically significant improvement on developers’ code-fixing performance, it did show a promising reduction in time for fixing vulnerable code.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它相关 Paper
- Security Notifications in Static Analysis Tools: Developers' Attitudes, Comprehension, and Ability to Act on ThemMohammad Tahaei, Kami Vaniea, Konstantin Beznosov, Maria K. WoltersCHI 2021 · 被引用 35 次
- "False negative - that one is going to kill you": Understanding Industry Perspectives of Static Analysis based Security TestingAmit Seal Ami, Kevin Moran, Denys Poshyvanyk, Adwait NadkarniS&P 2024 · 被引用 40 次
- Continuous Intrusion: Characterizing the Security of Continuous Integration ServicesYacong Gu, Lingyun Ying, Huajun Chai, Chu Qiao 等S&P 2023
- A large-scale study of usability criteria addressed by static analysis toolsMarcus Nachtigall, Michael Schlichtig, Eric BoddenISSTA 2022 · 被引用 38 次
- Closing the Gap: A User Study on the Real-world Usefulness of AI-powered Vulnerability Detection & Repair in the IDEBenjamin Steenhoek, Kalpathy Sivaraman, Renata Saldivar Gonzalez, Yevhen Mohylevskyy 等ICSE 2025 · 被引用 3 次
