AlphaPO: Reward Shape Matters for LLM Alignment
Aman Gupta, Shao Tang, Qingquan Song, Sirou Zhu, Jiwoo Hong, Ankan Saha, Viral Gupta, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Siyu Zhu, Parag Agrawal, Natesh S. Pillai, S. Sathiya Keerthi
摘要
Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) and its variants have made huge strides toward the effective alignment of large language models (LLMs) to follow instructions and reflect human values. More recently, Direct Alignment Algorithms (DAAs) have emerged in which the reward modeling stage of RLHF is skipped by characterizing the reward directly as a function of the policy being learned. Some popular examples of DAAs include Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Simple Preference Optimization (SimPO). These methods often suffer from likelihood displacement, a phenomenon by which the probabilities of preferred responses are often reduced undesirably. In this paper, we argue that, for DAAs the reward (function) shape matters. We introduce AlphaPO, a new DAA method that leverages an α-parameter to help change the shape of the reward function beyond the standard log reward. AlphaPO helps maintain fine-grained control over likelihood displacement and overoptimization. Compared to SimPO, one of the best performing DAAs, AlphaPO leads to about 7% to 10% relative improvement in alignment performance for the instruct versions of Mistral-7B and Llama3-8B while achieving 15% to 50% relative improvement over DPO on the same models. The analysis and results presented highlight the importance of the reward shape and how one can systematically change it to affect training dynamics, as well as improve alignment performance.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper6
- Normalized Rewards for Preference OptimizationShawn Im, Federico Danieli, Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald 等ICML 2026 · 被引用 571 次
- Margin-Aware Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models Without ReferenceJiwoo Hong, Sayak Paul, Noah Lee, Kashif Rasul 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 43 次
- The Differences Between Direct Alignment Algorithms are a BlurAlexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Viacheslav Sinii, Alexey Malakhov 等ICML 2026
- On the Robustness of Reward Models for Language Model AlignmentJiwoo Hong, Noah Lee, Eunki Kim, Guijin Son 等ICML 2025
- GeoAlign: Geometric Rollout Curation for Robust LLM Reinforcement LearningTing Zhou, Zhenqing Ling, Yiyang Zhao, Ying Shen 等ICML 2026
它引用的顶会 Paper19
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 64,255 次
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida 等NeurIPS 2022 · 被引用 24,707 次
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 10,924 次
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky 等ICML 2024 · 被引用 973 次
- RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human FeedbackHongyi Yuan, Zheng Yuan, Chuanqi Tan, Wei Wang 等NeurIPS 2023 · 被引用 515 次
相关 Paper
- AlphaDPO: Adaptive Reward Margin for Direct Preference OptimizationJunkang Wu, Xue Wang, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu 等ICML 2025
- Earlier Tokens Contribute More: Learning Direct Preference Optimization From Temporal Decay PerspectiveRuichen Shao, Bei Li, Gangao Liu, Yang Chen 等ICLR 2025
- ConfPO: Exploiting Policy Model Confidence for Critical Token Selection in Preference OptimizationHee Suk Yoon, Eunseop Yoon, Mark A. Hasegawa-Johnson, Sungwoong Kim 等ICML 2025
- Mitigating Reward Over-optimization in Direct Alignment Algorithms with Importance SamplingPhuc Minh Nguyen, Ngoc-Hieu Nguyen, Duy M. H. Nguyen, Anji Liu 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 3 次
- RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM AlignmentXiaoyang Cao, Zelai Xu, Mo Guang, Kaiwen Long 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 4 次
