From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning
Lingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen, Martin Q. Ma, Xiangchen Song, Yuekai Sun, Mikhail Yurochkin, Taylor W. Killian, Russ Salakhutdinov, Kun Zhang, Eric Xing, Zhengzhong Liu
摘要
Post-training pipelines that combine supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with reinforcement learning (RL) have emerged as the key recipe for transforming large language models (LLMs) into robust reasoners. We argue that this combined success is driven by compositional generalization, which we formalize through a hierarchical latent selection model. In this framework, reasoning traces are generated by a cascade of discrete latent selection variables corresponding to reusable atomic modules, including both skills (local operations) and routing mechanisms (how intermediate information is selected, reused, and composed). Within this model, we theoretically show that SFT and RL play asymmetric, complementary roles: SFT supplies the raw module materials in compositional traces, and RL decomposes those traces to identify the latent atomic modules and enable compositional generalization. We design controlled experiments to validate this theory. Our results demonstrate that RL can extract atomic modules from compound traces supplied by SFT and recombine them to solve new configurations. Moreover, we find that training on compound traces yields stronger generalization than training on isolated atomic modules. Finally, we investigate the relationship between SFT and RL data and identify an effective protocol in which SFT ensures coverage of all atomic modules through compositional traces, while RL focuses on novel compositions outside the SFT support to drive exploration.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper24
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 3,045 次
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 592 次
- Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMsXumeng Wen, Zihan Liu, Shun Zheng, Shengyu Ye 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 279 次
- Think before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause TokensSachin Goyal, Ziwei Ji, Ankit Singh Rawat, Aditya Krishna Menon 等ICLR 2024 · 被引用 240 次
- Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy PerspectiveDaixuan Cheng, Shaohan Huang, Xuekai Zhu, Bo Dai 等AAAI 2026 · 被引用 216 次
相关 Paper
- Unveiling the Compositional Ability Gap in Vision-Language Reasoning ModelTianle Li, Jihai Zhang, Yongming Rao, Yu ChengNeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 17 次
- From f(x) and g(x) to f(g(x)): LLMs Learn New Skills in RL by Composing Old OnesLifan Yuan, Weize Chen, Yuchen Zhang, Ganqu Cui 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 46 次
- Why Does Reinforcement Learning Generalize? A Feature-Level Mechanistic Study of Post-Training in Large Language ModelsDan Shi, Zhuowen Han, Simon Ostermann, Renren Jin 等ACL 2026 · 被引用 1 次
- RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMsKohsei Matsutani, Shota Takashiro, Gouki Minegishi, Takeshi Kojima 等ICLR 2026 · 被引用 36 次
- Hybrid Latent Reasoning via Reinforcement LearningZhenrui Yue, Bowen Jin, Huimin Zeng, Honglei Zhuang 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 28 次
