Multi-Threshold Byzantine Fault Tolerance
Atsuki Momose, Ling Ren
摘要
Classic Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) protocols are designed for a specific timing model, most often one of the following: synchronous, asynchronous or partially synchronous. It is well known that the timing model and fault tolerance threshold present inherent trade-offs. Synchronous protocols tolerate up to n/2 Byzantine faults, while asynchronous or partially synchronous protocols tolerate only up to n/3 Byzantine faults. In this work, we generalize the fault thresholds of BFT and introduce a new problem called multi-threshold BFT. Multi-threshold BFT has four separate fault thresholds for safety and liveness under synchrony and asynchrony (or partial-synchrony), respectively. Decomposing the fault thresholds in this way allows us to design protocols that provide meaningful fault tolerance under both synchrony and asynchrony (or partial synchrony). We establish tight fault thresholds bounds for multi-threshold BFT and present protocols achieving them. As an example, we show a BFT state machine replication (SMR) protocol that tolerates up to 2n/3 faults for safety under synchrony while tolerating up to n/3 faults for other scenarios (liveness under synchrony as well as safety and liveness under partial synchrony). This is strictly stronger than classic partially synchronous SMR protocols. We also present a general framework to transform known partially synchronous or asynchronous BFT SMR protocols to additionally enjoy the optimal 2n/3 fault tolerance for safety under synchrony.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper9
- GriDB: Scaling Blockchain Database via Sharding and Off-Chain Cross-Shard MechanismZicong Hong, Song Guo, Enyuan Zhou, Wuhui Chen 等VLDB 2023 · 被引用 65 次
- Bolt-Dumbo Transformer: Asynchronous Consensus As Fast As the Pipelined BFTYuan Lu, Zhenliang Lu, Qiang TangCCS 2022 · 被引用 49 次
- Prophet: Conflict-Free Sharding Blockchain via Byzantine-Tolerant Deterministic OrderingZicong Hong, Song Guo, Enyuan Zhou, Jianting Zhang 等INFOCOM 2023 · 被引用 40 次
- Optimal Flexible Consensus and its Application to EthereumJoachim Neu, Srivatsan Sridhar, Lei Yang, David TseS&P 2024 · 被引用 12 次
- Optimal Sharding for Scalable Blockchains with Deconstructed SMRJianting Zhang, Zhongtang Luo, Raghavendra Ramesh, Aniket KateVLDB 2025 · 被引用 7 次
它引用的顶会 Paper8
- The Honey Badger of BFT ProtocolsAndrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi 等CCS 2016 · 被引用 974 次
- BEAT: Asynchronous BFT Made PracticalSisi Duan, Michael K. Reiter, Haibin ZhangCCS 2018 · 被引用 255 次
- Sync HotStuff: Simple and Practical Synchronous State Machine ReplicationIttai Abraham, Dahlia Malkhi, Kartik Nayak, Ling Ren 等S&P 2020 · 被引用 240 次
- Flexible Byzantine Fault ToleranceDahlia Malkhi, Kartik Nayak, Ling RenCCS 2019 · 被引用 122 次
- Ebb-and-Flow Protocols: A Resolution of the Availability-Finality DilemmaJoachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, David TseS&P 2021 · 被引用 105 次
相关 Paper
- Recover from Excessive Faults in Partially-Synchronous BFT SMRTiantian Gong, Gustavo Franco Camilo, Kartik Nayak, Andrew Lewis-Pye 等USENIX Security 2025
- Bandle: Asynchronous State Machine Replication Made EfficientBo Wang, Shengyun Liu, He Dong, Xiangzhe Wang 等EuroSys 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Hydrangea: Optimistic Two-Round Partial Synchrony with Improved Fault ResilienceNibesh Shrestha, Aniket Kate, Kartik NayakUSENIX Security 2026
- On the Optimality of Optimistic ResponsivenessNibesh Shrestha, Ittai Abraham, Ling Ren, Kartik NayakCCS 2020 · 被引用 47 次
- Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds ConsensusFatima Elsheimy, Simon Holmgaard Kamp, Julian Loss, Jesper Buus NielsenCRYPTO 2026
