Lune

ICML2026顶会

Training AI Co-Scientists Using Rubric Rewards

Shashwat Goel, Rishi Hazra, Dulhan Jayalath, Timon Willi, Parag Jain, Shen, Ilias Leontiadis, Francesco Barbieri, Yoram Bachrach, Jonas Geiping, Chenxi Whitehouse

2026年份
4顶会引用

摘要

AI co-scientists are emerging as a tool to assist human researchers in achieving their research goals. A crucial feature of these AI co-scientists is the ability to generate a research plan given a set of aims and constraints. The plan may be used by researchers for brainstorming, or may even be implemented after further refinement. However, language models currently struggle to generate research plans that follow all constraints and implicit requirements due to the open-ended nature of the task. Moreover, verification of research plans by executing experiments is slow and expensive to obtain. In this work, we study how to leverage the vast corpus of existing research papers to train language models that generate better research plans. We build a scalable, diverse training corpus by automatically extracting research goals and goal-specific grading rubrics from papers across several domains. We then train models for research plan generation via reinforcement learning with self-grading. A frozen copy of the initial policy acts as the grader, accessing the rubrics as privileged information to evaluate plans generated by the training policy. This setup creates a generator-verifier gap that enables improvements without external human supervision. To validate this approach, we conduct a study with human experts for machine learning research goals, spanning 225 hours. The experts prefer plans generated by our finetuned Qwen3-30B-A3B model over the initial model for 70% of research goals, and approve 84% of the automatically extracted goal-specific grading rubrics. To assess generality, we also extend our approach to research goals from medical papers, and new arXiv preprints, evaluating with a jury of frontier models. Our finetuning yields 12-22% relative improvements and significant cross-domain generalization, proving effective even in problem settings like medical research where execution feedback is infeasible. Together, these findings demonstrate the potential of a scalable, automated training recipe as a step towards improving general AI co-scientists.

问问这篇 Paper

智能体会读完全文。

Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了最后一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。

可以从这些问题问起

智能体调用

Luneget_paper_fulltext

在 Lune 里问

免费开始,无需绑卡

lune papers fulltext 02b9fced-fee7-4ff3-9c3e-3adae084e301

引用它的顶会 Paper4

问问它们各自怎么用它

它引用的顶会 Paper10

相关 Paper

黄昏的海面,两侧是细线勾勒的悬崖