The Value of AI Guidance in Human Examination of Synthetically-Generated Faces
Aidan Boyd, Patrick Tinsley, Kevin W. Bowyer, Adam Czajka
摘要
Face image synthesis has progressed beyond the point at which humans can effectively distinguish authentic faces from synthetically-generated ones. Recently developed synthetic face image detectors boast better-than-human'' discriminative ability, especially those guided by human perceptual intelligence during the model's training process. In this paper, we investigate whether these human-guided synthetic face detectors can assist non-expert human operators in the task of synthetic image detection when compared to models trained without human-guidance. We conducted a large-scale experiment with more than 1,560 subjects classifying whether an image shows an authentic or synthetically-generated face, and annotating regions supporting their decisions. In total, 56,015 annotations across 3,780 unique face images were collected. All subjects first examined samples without any AI support, followed by samples given (a) the AI's decision (synthetic'' or ``authentic''), (b) class activation maps illustrating where the model deems salient for its decision,
or (c) both the AI's decision and AI's saliency map. Synthetic faces were generated with six modern Generative Adversarial Networks. Interesting observations from this experiment include: (1) models trained with human-guidance, which are also more accurate in our experiments, offer better support to human examination of face images when compared to models trained traditionally using cross-entropy loss, (2) binary decisions presented to humans results in their better performance than when saliency maps are presented, (3) understanding the AI's accuracy helps humans to increase trust in a given model and thus increase their overall accuracy. This work demonstrates that although humans supported by machines achieve better-than-random accuracy of synthetic face detection, the approaches of supplying humans with AI support and of building trust are key factors determining high effectiveness of the human-AI tandem.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper2
- Seeing, Hearing, and Knowing Together: Multimodal Strategies in Deepfake Videos DetectionChen Chen, Dion GohCHI 2026 · 被引用 2 次
- U-trustworthy Models. Reliability, Competence, and Confidence in Decision-MakingRitwik Vashistha, Arya FarahiAAAI 2024
它引用的顶会 Paper6
- Training Generative Adversarial Networks with Limited DataTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Janne Hellsten, Samuli Laine 等NeurIPS 2020 · 被引用 2,345 次
- Alias-Free Generative Adversarial NetworksTero Karras, Miika Aittala, Samuli Laine, Erik Härkönen 等NeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 2,126 次
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok 等CHI 2021 · 被引用 713 次
- Human Attention in Image Captioning: Dataset and AnalysisSen He, Hamed Rezazadegan Tavakoli, Ali Borji, Nicolas PugeaultICCV 2019 · 被引用 55 次
- StarGAN v2: Diverse Image Synthesis for Multiple DomainsYunjey Choi, Youngjung Uh, Jaejun Yoo, Jung-Woo HaCVPR 2020
相关 Paper
- Double Face: Leveraging User Intelligence to Characterize and Recognize AI-synthesized FacesMatthew Joslin, Xian Wang, Shuang HaoUSENIX Security 2024 · 被引用 4 次
- Unraveling the Dilemma of AI Errors: Exploring the Effectiveness of Human and Machine Explanations for Large Language ModelsMarvin Pafla, Kate Larson, Mark HancockCHI 2024 · 被引用 16 次
- The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scoresGiang Nguyen, Daeyoung Kim, Anh NguyenNeurIPS 2021 · 被引用 128 次
- On the Detection of Digital Face ManipulationHao Dang, Feng Liu, Joel Stehouwer, Xiaoming Liu 等CVPR 2020
- Bi-Level Optimization for Self-Supervised AI-Generated Face DetectionMian Zou, Nan Zhong, Baosheng Yu, Yibing Zhan 等ICCV 2025 · 被引用 2 次
