The Power of Anomaly Detection in Predictive Maintenance: [Experiments & Analysis]
Anastasios Papadopoulos, Apostolos Giannoulidis, Anastasios Gounaris, John Paparrizos
摘要
Predictive maintenance (PdM) is a key application of the industrial IoT, using sensor-acquired time-series data to forecast equipment failures that cost billions of dollars annually. Time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) offers a promising route to PdM, yet prior work is constrained by: i) reliance on private datasets or case studies, requiring extensive domain-specific engineering; ii) evaluation of only a small number of algorithms, limiting comparative insight; iii) use of a single implementation strategy per algorithm, hindering potential improvements; iv) emphasis on supervised solutions, necessitating annotated data that are costly or unavailable in practice; and v) neglect of runtime and online applicability, raising questions about deployability. To address these limitations, we present an extensive experimental study with rigorous statistical analysis conducted within a common evaluation framework. Our objectives are to: i) provide insights into the accuracy, robustness, and behavior of TSAD techniques in an online PdM setting across four implementation strategies; ii) analyze effectiveness–runtime trade-offs; and iii) rate dataset difficulty and characterize the forms exhibited by anomalies preceding machine breakdowns. Our findings indicate that most industrial cases benefit from an initial calibration phase for operational data collection. Well-established traditional TSAD methods deliver the best trade-off among effectiveness, runtime efficiency, and the ability to predict individual failure types; pre-trained LLMs are still statistically outperformed in this context, suggesting that there is still room for improvement in that direction. Our study serves as a significant step towards disseminating TSAD for PdM and we open source our work to support future research.
问问这篇 Paper
智能体会读完全文。
Lune 把这篇 Paper 索引到了每一个公式,引用它的顶会 Paper 也一样。你提问,回答直接引用原文。
引用它的顶会 Paper1
问问它们各自怎么用它它引用的顶会 Paper41
- Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Lei Zhang, Qiang XuAAAI 2023 · 被引用 3,619 次
- TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series DataShreshth Tuli, Giuliano Casale, Nicholas R. JenningsVLDB 2022 · 被引用 930 次
- PyTorch 2: Faster Machine Learning Through Dynamic Python Bytecode Transformation and Graph CompilationJason Ansel, Edward Z. Yang, Horace He, Natalia Gimelshein 等ASPLOS 2024 · 被引用 693 次
- Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly DetectionLukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Nico Görnitz, Alexander Binder 等ICLR 2020 · 被引用 678 次
- Anomaly Detection in Time Series: A Comprehensive EvaluationSebastian Schmidl, Phillip Wenig, Thorsten PapenbrockVLDB 2022 · 被引用 578 次
相关 Paper
- A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Enabling Early Anomaly Detection with Correlation AnalysisYihao Ang, Qiang Huang, Anthony K. H. Tung, Zhiyong HuangICDE 2023 · 被引用 6 次
- Delving into Large Language Models for Effective Time-Series Anomaly DetectionJunwoo Park, Kyudan Jung, Dohyun Lee, Hyuck Lee 等NeurIPS 2025 · 被引用 1 次
- TAB: Unified Benchmarking of Time Series Anomaly Detection MethodsXiangfei Qiu, Zhe Li, Wanghui Qiu, Shiyan Hu 等VLDB 2025 · 被引用 57 次
- Harnessing Vision-Language Models for Time Series Anomaly DetectionZelin He, Sarah Alnegheimish, Matthew ReimherrAAAI 2026 · 被引用 10 次
- PeFAD: A Parameter-Efficient Federated Framework for Time Series Anomaly DetectionRonghui Xu, Hao Miao, Senzhang Wang, Philip S. Yu 等KDD 2024 · 被引用 32 次
