Lune

Comparisons

Lune vs Jenni

Jenni writes with you: autocomplete, edits, chat over uploaded PDFs, citations dropped into the draft. Lune writes nothing. It supplies the evidence your agent writes from, and checks what you already wrote.

Install the connectorSee pricingjenni.ai

Start with the one you should not buy from us

If the first list is you, take Jenni.

Choose Jenni if

  • Getting words on the page is the bottleneck.
  • You want citation formatting handled inside the editor.
  • Chatting with uploaded PDFs while you draft is how you work.

Choose Lune if

  • The words are fine; the citations are the risk.
  • You want each claim matched to a quote you can read.
  • You already draft in an agent and do not want another editor.

From a question to a citation

Jenni

  1. Draft in the editor
  2. Autocomplete and edit
  3. Citation inserted

Lune

  1. Send the claim
  2. Read the full text
  3. Quote with a locator
One helps you write the sentence. The other proves it.

Line by line

Marks the side we think wins. We mark the ones we lose.

  • Who writes

    Lune

    Your agent. Lune has no editor.

    Jenni

    Jenni wins this row. Jenni, with you, in its own editor.

  • Where sources come from

    Lune

    Lune wins this row. Top-tier venues, most papers in full text, plus your uploads.

    Jenni

    PDFs you upload, plus its citation search.

  • How a claim is backed

    Lune

    Lune wins this row. A verbatim quote and its locator, per claim.

    Jenni

    A citation inserted next to the sentence.

  • Where it runs

    Lune

    Lune wins this row. Any MCP client, plus a CLI and three miniapps.

    Jenni

    The Jenni web editor.

  • Limits that bite

    Lune

    Lune wins this row. Requests a day. That is the only meter.

    Jenni

    Autocompletes, chat messages, edits and uploads, all tiered.

  • Entry price

    Lune

    Lune wins this row. $4.99 a month ($47.90 a year), or free for 10 requests a day.

    Jenni

    $12 a month for Plus, $29 for Pro.

Where the difference comes from

Writing help and evidence are separate purchases

Jenni is one of the most used academic writing tools there is, and if the blank page is your problem it solves the blank page. Citation insertion in the editor is genuinely convenient.

Convenience is also where citation risk enters. A reference dropped in beside a sentence looks finished whether or not the paper supports what the sentence says, and nothing in the writing flow forces that question.

What Lune refuses to do

Lune will not draft your paragraph. That is not a missing feature; the model in your agent already writes better than a bolted-on editor, and the part it cannot do is remember what a paper actually reported.

So the tools answer only with what they found: the quote, its location, or nothing at all. Nothing found is a real answer here, and it is the one an autocomplete can never give you.

What your agent can call

  • search_papers
  • search_papers_many
  • search_related_papers
  • get_paper_fulltext
  • get_paper_citations
  • extract_from_papers
  • verify_claims
  • gather_evidence
  • list_conferences
  • get_conference_papers
  • search_research_guidance
  • get_research_guidance_doc

One connection, in Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, ChatGPT or anything else that speaks MCP. The same tools back the miniapps in the Lune dashboard.

Price

Lune

Free
$0 10 requests a day, every tool
Pro
$4.99 a month or $47.90 a year, 300 requests a day
Max
$9.99 a month or $95.90 a year, 600 requests a day
Credits
$0.99 300 extra requests, no expiry

Jenni

Free
$0 10 autocompletes a day
Plus
$12 a month, 5,000 autocompletes
Pro
$29 a month, unlimited

ScholarAI's research features are also surfaced inside Jenni. Prices move; treat this as a snapshot, not a quote.

What we read

Questions

Is Lune a Jenni alternative?
Not for writing. Lune supplies and checks evidence; Jenni helps produce the prose. Many people would use one of each.
Does Lune write my paper?
No. Your agent writes, and Lune answers with quotes. Its Critique miniapp reviews a draft against reviewer expectations.
Can I use both?
Yes. Draft where you like, then check the claims against source text before it goes anywhere.

Trustworthy AI for Scientific Research

Free to start. Every tool from the first request.

Try Lune All comparisons