Semantically Comprehensive Token Pruning in LVLMs via Maximizing Concept Coverage
Xueting Li, Qi Liu, Chenghao Xu, Xu Yang, Guangtao Lyu, Jiahua Li, Cheng Deng
Abstract
High-resolution visual tokens impose substantial computational burdens owing to extreme redundancy in Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs). Existing visual token pruning methods typically leverage simple metrics derived from human experience, such as attention or similarity, to rank and select tokens within a highly entangled feature space. However, these metrics lack interpretability and often introduce human bias, failing to capture the genuine semantic significance of tokens, especially amidst the inherent semantic complexity and ambiguity of visual tokens. To mitigate this limitation, we propose a novel Semantically Comprehensive Token Selection (SCTS) method for unbiased, interpretable visual token pruning via a concept-driven paradigm. To unravel the model's intrinsic semantic representation mechanism, we first introduce a Sparse Autoencoder to disentangle visual features into an interpretable space, with each dimension encoding a distinct semantic concept. We then formulate the token pruning task as a Maximum Concept Coverage problem, quantifying the Marginal Semantic Gain (MSG) of each token's contribution to uncovered concepts and iteratively selecting tokens with the highest MSG. This concept-centric approach prioritizes tokens with unique semantic contributions, guaranteeing semantic comprehensiveness while preserving robust performance even at high compression ratios. Extensive experiments across multiple LVLM architectures and benchmarks verify that SCTS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, achieving a superior trade-off between computational efficiency and semantic completeness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff93a552-9194-4764-9839-d9f3bc126021Builds on14
- MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language ModelsDeyao Zhu, Jun Chen, Xiaoqian Shen, Xiang Li et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,079 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language ModelsYifan Li, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou, Jinpeng Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 344 citations
- Token Merging: Your ViT But FasterDaniel Bolya, Cheng-Yang Fu, Xiaoliang Dai, Peizhao Zhang et al.ICLR 2023 · 62 citations
- HiRED: Attention-Guided Token Dropping for Efficient Inference of High-Resolution Vision-Language ModelsKazi Hasan Ibn Arif, JinYi Yoon, Dimitrios S. Nikolopoulos, Hans Vandierendonck et al.AAAI 2025 · 49 citations
Related papers
- SCoRe: Salience-Coverage Reduction for Vision Token Pruning in Vision-Language ModelsTong Xu, Hailong Shi, Xingyu GaoCVPR 2026
- SCOPE: Saliency-Coverage Oriented Token Pruning for Efficient Multimodel LLMsJinhong Deng, Wen Li, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Yang HeNeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- Reducing Token Redundancy in LVLMs: A Systematic Review of Token Pruning MethodsHanzhang Yuan, Mengxuan Hu, Wenhao Zhang, Tianlong Wang et al.ACL 2026
- One Layer's Trash is Another Layer's Treasure: Adaptive Layer-wise Visual Token Selection in LVLMsYongru Chen, Kai Zhang, Zeliang Zong, Yuchen Lu et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMsQizhe Zhang, Aosong Cheng, Ming Lu, Renrui Zhang et al.ICCV 2025 · 8 citations
