Data-Free Group-Wise Fully Quantized Winograd Convolution via Learnable Scales
Shuokai Pan, Gerti Tuzi, Sudarshan Sreeram, Dibakar Gope
Abstract
Despite the revolutionary breakthroughs of large-scale textto-image diffusion models for complex vision and downstream tasks, their extremely high computational and storage costs limit their usability. Quantization of diffusion models has been explored in recent works to reduce compute costs and memory bandwidth usage. To further improve inference time, fast convolution algorithms such as Winograd can be used for convolution layers, which account for a significant portion of computations in diffusion models. However, the significant quality loss of fully quantized Winograd using existing coarser-grained post-training quantization methods, combined with the complexity and cost of finetuning the Winograd transformation matrices for such large models to recover quality, makes them unsuitable for large-scale foundation models. Motivated by the presence of a large range of values in them, we investigate the impact of finer-grained group-wise quantization in quantizing diffusion models. While group-wise quantization can largely handle the fully quantized Winograd convolution, it struggles to deal with the large distribution imbalance in a sizable portion of the Winograd domain computation. To reduce range differences in the Winograd domain, we propose finetuning only the scale parameters of the Winograd transform matrices without using any domain-specific training data. Because our method does not depend on any training data, the generalization performance of quantized diffusion models is safely guaranteed. For text-to-image generation task, the 8-bit fully-quantized diffusion model with Winograd provides near-lossless quality (FID and CLIP scores) in comparison to the full-precision model. This, coupled with the development of highly optimized kernels for groupwise fully quantized Winograd, improves CPU wall-clock time by 31.3% when compared to the convolution layers of a diffusion model. For image classification, our method outperforms the state-of-the-art Winograd PTQ method by 1.62% and 2.56% in top-1 ImageNet accuracy on respectively, with Winograd F(6, 3) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff61f8e5-7ead-4927-95af-b4cb9a8470beBuilds on26
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image SynthesisPrafulla Dhariwal, Alexander Quinn NicholNeurIPS 2021 · 13,211 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Implicit ModelsJiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, Stefano ErmonICLR 2021 · 11,743 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
Related papers
- DGQ: Distribution-Aware Group Quantization for Text-to-Image Diffusion ModelsHyogon Ryu, NaHyeon Park, Hyunjung ShimICLR 2025
- Temporal Dynamic Quantization for Diffusion ModelsJunhyuk So, Jungwon Lee, Daehyun Ahn, Hyungjun Kim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 109 citations
- Q-Diffusion: Quantizing Diffusion ModelsXiuyu Li, Yijiang Liu, Long Lian, Huanrui Yang et al.ICCV 2023 · 279 citations
- Gradient-Aligned Calibration for Post-Training Quantization of Diffusion ModelsDung Anh Hoang, Cuong Pham, Trung Le, Jianfei Cai et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Q-DiT: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Diffusion TransformersLei Chen, Yuan Meng, Chen Tang, Xinzhu Ma et al.CVPR 2025
