Fine-Grained and Controlled Rewriting in Blockchains: Chameleon-Hashing Gone Attribute-Based
David Derler, Kai Samelin, Daniel Slamanig, Christoph Striecks
Abstract
Blockchain technologies recently received a considerable amount of attention. While the initial focus was mainly on the use of blockchains in the context of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, application scenarios now go far beyond this. Most blockchains have the property that once some object, e.g., a block or a transaction, has been registered to be included into the blockchain, it is persisted and there are no means to modify it again. While this is an essential feature of most blockchain scenarios, it is still often desirable-at times it may be even legally required-to allow for breaking this immutability in a controlled way. Only recently, Ateniese et al. (EUROS&P 2017) proposed an elegant solution to this problem on the block level. Thereby, the authors replace standard hash functions with so-called chameleon-hashes (Krawczyk and Rabin, NDSS 2000). While their work seems to offer a suitable solution to the problem of controlled re-writing of blockchains, their approach is too coarse-grained in that it only offers an all-or-nothing solution. We revisit this idea and introduce the novel concept of policybased chameleon-hashes (PCH). PCHs generalize the notion of chameleon-hashes by giving the party computing a hash the ability to associate access policies to the generated hashes. Anyone who possesses enough privileges to satisfy the policy can then find arbitrary collisions for a given hash. We then apply this concept to transaction-level rewriting within blockchains, and thus support fine-grained and controlled modifiability of blockchain objects. Besides modeling PCHs, we present a generic construction of PCHs (using a strengthened version of chameleon-hashes with ephemeral trapdoors which we also introduce), rigorously prove its security, and instantiate it with efficient building blocks. We report first implementation results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ff2e5654-2d47-457a-8a58-f1af88c46669Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- Phoenix: Detect and Locate Resilience Issues in Blockchain via Context-Sensitive ChaosFuchen Ma, Yuanliang Chen, Yuanhang Zhou, Jingxuan Sun et al.CCS 2023 · 10 citations
- Redactable Blockchain in the Permissionless SettingDominic Deuber, Bernardo Magri, Sri Aravinda Krishnan ThyagarajanS&P 2019 · 153 citations
- vChain+: Optimizing Verifiable Blockchain Boolean Range QueriesHaixin Wang, Cheng Xu, Ce Zhang, Jianliang Xu et al.ICDE 2022 · 95 citations
- SChain: Scalable Concurrency over Flexible Permissioned BlockchainXiaodong Qi, Zhihao Chen, Haizhen Zhuo, Quanqing Xu et al.ICDE 2023 · 17 citations
- Poros: Secure and Highly Parallel Sharding Blockchain with Optimized Cross-Shard Transaction ProcessingZhuocheng Pan, Jianwei Liu, Andi Liu, Yuxuan Hu et al.CCS 2026
