RRR-SMR: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Better Methods for Practical Lock-Free Data Structures
Md Amit Hasan Arovi, Ruslan Nikolaev
Abstract
Traditionally, most concurrent algorithms rely on safe memory reclamation (SMR) schemes for manual memory management. SMR schemes such as epoch-based reclamation (EBR) and hazard pointers (HP) are typically viewed as the only solution for memory recycling.
When using SMR, a new object needs to be allocated whenever something new is added to a data structure. However, in more complex scenarios, the same object may need to be moved between different data structures (e.g., moving a node from one list to another, and then back to the original list) in a copy-free manner, i.e., without deallocating and allocating the node again. It is typically impossible for two reasons: (1) the ABA problem would still arise even when using SMR since the same pointer can reappear (without going through the full SMR cycle) if the same node eventually ends up back in the original data structure; (2) while in simple queues and stacks, nodes can immediately be recycled, it is unclear how to adapt data structures which use non-trivial traversal and two-phase deletion strategies, e.g., linked lists, skip lists, hash tables, trees, etc., where it is seemingly impossible to always immediately move (logically) deleted objects since they might still be accessed by other threads.
We propose a general method of creating RRR (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) data structures to allow safe memory recycling when using SMR which addresses the above-mentioned problems. Our method is applicable to linked lists, skip lists, hash tables, Natarajan-Mittal tree, and other data structures. We also discuss and propose a specialized approach -a more efficient version of Michael-and-Scott's (recycling) queue. Our evaluation on x86-64 shows promising results when using our methods for different data structures and SMR schemes.
CCS Concepts: • Theory of computation → Concurrent algorithms.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fee86c5a-723b-481b-92cf-498b8af180f0Builds on11
- Concurrent deferred reference counting with constant-time overheadDaniel Anderson, Guy E. Blelloch, Yuanhao WeiPLDI 2021 · 26 citations
- A marriage of pointer- and epoch-based reclamationJeehoon Kang, Jaehwang JungPLDI 2020 · 25 citations
- NBR: neutralization based reclamationAjay Singh, Trevor Brown, Ali José MashtizadehPPoPP 2021 · 23 citations
- Universal wait-free memory reclamationRuslan Nikolaev, Binoy RavindranPPoPP 2020 · 23 citations
- OrcGC: automatic lock-free memory reclamationAndreia Correia, Pedro Ramalhete, Pascal FelberPPoPP 2021 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Fixing Non-blocking Data Structures for Better Compatibility with Memory Reclamation SchemesMd Amit Hasan Arovi, Ruslan NikolaevPPoPP 2026 · 1 citation
- Turning manual concurrent memory reclamation into automatic reference countingDaniel Anderson, Guy E. Blelloch, Yuanhao WeiPLDI 2022 · 14 citations
- A Family of Fast and Memory Efficient Lock- and Wait-Free ReclamationRuslan Nikolaev, Binoy RavindranPLDI 2024 · 7 citations
- Efficiently reclaiming memory in concurrent search data structures while bounding wasted memoryDaniel Solomon, Adam MorrisonPPoPP 2021 · 1 citation
- Leveraging Immutability to Validate Hazard Pointers for Optimistic TraversalsJanggun Lee, Jeonghyeon Kim, Jeehoon KangPLDI 2025 · 2 citations
