Mutual Effort for Efficiency: A Similarity-based Token Pruning for Vision Transformers in Self-Supervised Learning
Sheng Li, Qitao Tan, Yue Dai, Zhenglun Kong, Tianyu Wang, Jun Liu, Ao Li, Ninghao Liu, Yufei Ding, Xulong Tang, Geng Yuan
Abstract
Self-supervised learning (SSL) offers a compelling solution to the challenge of extensive labeled data requirements in traditional supervised learning. With the proven success of Vision Transformers (ViTs) in supervised tasks, there is increasing interest in adapting them for SSL frameworks. However, the high computational demands of SSL pose substantial challenges, particularly on resource-limited platforms like edge devices, despite its ability to achieve high accuracy without labeled data. Recent studies in supervised learning have shown that token pruning can reduce training costs by removing less informative tokens without compromising accuracy. However, SSL's dual-branch encoders make traditional single-branch pruning strategies less effective, as they fail to account for the critical cross-branch similarity information, leading to reduced accuracy in SSL. To this end, we introduce SimPrune, a novel token pruning strategy designed for ViTs in SSL. SimPrune leverages cross-branch similarity information to efficiently prune tokens, retaining essential semantic information across dual branches. Additionally, we incorporate a difficulty-aware pruning strategy to further enhance SimPrune's effectiveness. Experimental results show that our proposed approach effectively reduces training computation while maintaining accuracy. Specifically, our approach offers 24% savings in training costs compared to SSL baseline, without sacrificing accuracy.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fe6ef3fa-3b6a-4640-a74a-4cfa10d9c954Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on28
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent - A New Approach to Self-Supervised LearningJean-Bastien Grill, Florian Strub, Florent Altché, Corentin Tallec et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 9,171 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision TransformersMathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Ishan Misra, Hervé Jégou et al.ICCV 2021 · 8,921 citations
Related papers
- HeatViT: Hardware-Efficient Adaptive Token Pruning for Vision TransformersPeiyan Dong, Mengshu Sun, Alec Lu, Yanyue Xie et al.HPCA 2023 · 117 citations
- Zero-TPrune: Zero-Shot Token Pruning Through Leveraging of the Attention Graph in Pre-Trained TransformersHongjie Wang, Bhishma Dedhia, Niraj K. JhaCVPR 2024 · 24 citations
- V-Pruner: A Fast and Globally-informed Token Pruning Framework for Vision TransformerGuangzhen Yao, Jiayun Zheng, Zezhou Wang, Wenxin Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Waxing-and-Waning: a Generic Similarity-based Framework for Efficient Self-Supervised LearningSheng Li, Chao Wu, Ao Li, Yanzhi Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 4 citations
- CAP: Correlation-Aware Pruning for Highly-Accurate Sparse Vision ModelsDenis Kuznedelev, Eldar Kurtic, Elias Frantar, Dan AlistarhNeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
