USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
A Formal Analysis of IEEE 802.11's WPA2: Countering the Kracks Caused by Cracking the Counters
Cas Cremers, Benjamin Kiesl, Niklas Medinger
Abstract
The IEEE 802.11 WPA2 protocol is widely used across the globe to protect network connections. The protocol, which is specified on more than three-thousand pages and has received various patches over the years, is extremely complex and therefore hard to analyze. In particular, it involves various mechanisms that interact with each other in subtle ways, which offers little hope for modular reasoning. Perhaps because of this, there exists no formal or cryptographic argument that shows that the patches to the core protocol indeed prevent the corresponding attacks, such as, e.g., the notorious KRACK attacks from 2017. In this work, we address this situation and present an extensive formal analysis of the WPA2 protocol design. Our model is the first that is detailed enough to detect the KRACK attacks; it includes mechanisms such as the four-way handshake, the group-key handshake, WNM sleep mode, the dataconfidentiality protocol, and their complex interactions. Our analysis provides the first security argument, in any formalism, that the patched WPA2 protocol meets its claimed security guarantees in the face of complex modern attacks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fe600162-9073-4297-96f5-4fa7a17368d9Cited by top-tier papers17
- Fragment and Forge: Breaking Wi-Fi Through Frame Aggregation and FragmentationMathy VanhoefUSENIX Security 2021 · 48 citations
- A Logic and an Interactive Prover for the Computational Post-Quantum Security of ProtocolsCas Cremers, Caroline Fontaine, Charlie JacommeS&P 2022 · 19 citations
- A Formally Verified Configuration for Hardware Security Modules in the CloudRiccardo Focardi, Flaminia L. LuccioCCS 2021 · 6 citations
- Untangling the Knot: Breaking Access Control in Home Wireless Mesh NetworksXin'an Zhou, Qing Deng, Juefei Pu, Keyu Man et al.CCS 2024 · 2 citations
- SpecMon: Modular Black-Box Runtime Monitoring of Security ProtocolsKevin Morio, Robert KünnemannCCS 2024 · 2 citations
Builds on7
- Key Reinstallation Attacks: Forcing Nonce Reuse in WPA2Mathy Vanhoef, Frank PiessensCCS 2017 · 437 citations
- A Formal Analysis of 5G AuthenticationDavid A. Basin, Jannik Dreier, Lucca Hirschi, Sasa Radomirovic et al.CCS 2018 · 428 citations
- A Comprehensive Symbolic Analysis of TLS 1.3Cas Cremers, Marko Horvat, Jonathan Hoyland, Sam Scott et al.CCS 2017 · 247 citations
- Verified Models and Reference Implementations for the TLS 1.3 Standard CandidateKarthikeyan Bhargavan, Bruno Blanchet, Nadim KobeissiS&P 2017 · 233 citations
- Component-Based Formal Analysis of 5G-AKA: Channel Assumptions and Session ConfusionCas Cremers, Martin Dehnel-WildNDSS 2019 · 131 citations
Related papers
- Release the Kraken: New KRACKs in the 802.11 StandardMathy Vanhoef, Frank PiessensCCS 2018 · 69 citations
- WCDCAnalyzer: Scalable Security Analysis of Wi-Fi Certified Device Connectivity ProtocolsZilin Shen, Imtiaz Karim, Elisa BertinoNDSS 2026
- Predicting, Decrypting, and Abusing WPA2/802.11 Group KeysMathy Vanhoef, Frank PiessensUSENIX Security 2016 · 47 citations
- Provable Security and Privacy Analysis of WPA3's SAE and SAE-PK ProtocolsShan Chen, Kaige Pan, Olga SaninaEUROCRYPT 2026
- Formal Model-Driven Discovery of Bluetooth Protocol Design VulnerabilitiesJianliang Wu, Ruoyu Wu, Dongyan Xu, Dave Jing Tian et al.S&P 2022 · 36 citations
