Securing Multimodal AI through Internal Information Decomposition
Jehyeok Yeon, Hyeonjeong Ha, Qiusi Zhan, Heng Ji
Abstract
Multimodal large language models introduce attack surfaces absent in unimodal systems: adversaries can distribute malicious intent across modalities to evade unimodal safeguards. This motivates using cross-modal consistency as a detection signal rather than inspecting each modality in isolation. Our key observation is that benign inputs induce compatible predictive behavior from text-only and vision-only reasoning that stabilizes when fused, whereas adversarial manipulation disrupts this consistency, causing abnormal multimodal behavior. Existing defenses that examine raw inputs or outputs overlook this internal fusion process, rendering them brittle and computationally expensive. We propose FlowGuard, a lightweight inference-time framework that detects harmful inputs by monitoring internal multimodal consistency. Unlike approaches that rely on scalar confidence metrics, FlowGuard derives FlowVectors inspired by Partial Information Decomposition that quantify cross-modal redundancy, synergy, and modality-specific dominance, capturing whether multimodal fusion aligns with unimodal semantic evidencebetween unimodal and fused multimodal output distributions. In a one-class classification problem trained solely on benign data, FlowGuard reduces Attack Success Rates from to on unseen attacks, with utility loss and up to a latency reduction. Our results demonstrate that monitoring cross-modal consistency offers an efficient and effective defense for multimodal reasoning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on9
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without SupervisionCollin Burns, Haotian Ye, Dan Klein, Jacob SteinhardtICLR 2023 · 45 citations
- ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMsFengqing Jiang, Zhangchen Xu, Luyao Niu, Zhen Xiang et al.ACL 2024 · 36 citations
- White-box Multimodal Jailbreaks Against Large Vision-Language ModelsRuofan Wang, Xingjun Ma, Hanxu Zhou, Chuanjun Ji et al.ACM MM 2024 · 22 citations
Related papers
- MLLM-Protector: Ensuring MLLM's Safety without Hurting PerformanceRenjie Pi, Tianyang Han, Jianshu Zhang, Yueqi Xie et al.EMNLP 2024 · 21 citations
- ETA: Evaluating Then Aligning Safety of Vision Language Models at Inference TimeYi Ding, Bolian Li, Ruqi ZhangICLR 2025 · 2 citations
- ConfGuard: A Simple and Effective Backdoor Detection for Large Language ModelsZihan Wang, Rui Zhang, Hongwei Li, Wenshu Fan et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Compose and Fuse: Revisiting the Foundational Bottlenecks in Multimodal ReasoningYucheng Wang, Yifan Hou, Aydin Javadov, Mubashara Akhtar et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Mitigating Safety Context Amnesia in Multimodal Reasoning Models via Intent-Guided Safety ReasoningXiyao Dong, Guangsheng Cheng, YiLong Chen, Xiaojin Zhang et al.ACL 2026
