Intention-Conditioned Flow Occupancy Models
Chongyi Zheng, Seohong Park, Sergey Levine, Benjamin Eysenbach
Abstract
Large-scale pre-training has fundamentally changed how machine learning research is done today: large foundation models are trained once, and then can be used by anyone in the community (including those without data or compute resources to train a model from scratch) to adapt and fine-tune to specific tasks. Applying this same framework to reinforcement learning (RL) is appealing because it offers compelling avenues for addressing core challenges in RL, including sample efficiency and robustness. However, there remains a fundamental challenge to pre-train large models in the context of RL: actions have long-term dependencies, so training a foundation model that reasons across time is important. Recent advances in generative AI have provided new tools for modeling highly complex distributions. In this paper, we build a probabilistic model to predict which states an agent will visit in the temporally distant future (i.e., an occupancy measure) using flow matching. As large datasets are often constructed by many distinct users performing distinct tasks, we include in our model a latent variable capturing the user intention. This intention increases the expressivity of our model, and enables adaptation with generalized policy improvement. We call our proposed method intention-conditioned flow occupancy models (InFOM). Comparing with alternative methods for pre-training, our experiments on state-based and image-based benchmark tasks demonstrate that the proposed method achieves median improvement in returns and increases success rates by .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fdd92c20-e960-48f5-bf0a-2b01b107d0a6Cited by top-tier papers4
- Value FlowsPerry Dong, Chongyi Zheng, Chelsea Finn, Dorsa Sadigh et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Universal Horizon ModelsHojun Chung, Junseo Lee, Songhwai OhICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Compositional Planning with Jumpy World ModelsJesse Farebrother, Matteo Pirotta, Andrea Tirinzoni, Marc Bellemare et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement LearningJun-Jie Yang, Chia-Heng Hsu, Kui-Yuan Chen, Ping-Chun HsiehICML 2026
Builds on69
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
Related papers
- Flow Matching with Injected Noise for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement LearningYongjae Shin, Jongseong Chae, Jongeui Park, Youngchul SungICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Parrot: Data-Driven Behavioral Priors for Reinforcement LearningAvi Singh, Huihan Liu, Gaoyue Zhou, Albert Yu et al.ICLR 2021 · 161 citations
- Flattening Hierarchies with Policy BootstrappingJohn L. Zhou, Jonathan C. KaoNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Scaling Offline Model-Based RL via Jointly-Optimized World-Action Model PretrainingJie Cheng, Ruixi Qiao, Yingwei Ma, Binhua Li et al.ICLR 2025
- Temporal Difference FlowsJesse Farebrother, Matteo Pirotta, Andrea Tirinzoni, Rémi Munos et al.ICML 2025
