Prioritizing Samples in Reinforcement Learning with Reducible Loss
Shivakanth Sujit, Somjit Nath, Pedro H. M. Braga, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou
Abstract
Most reinforcement learning algorithms take advantage of an experience replay buffer to repeatedly train on samples the agent has observed in the past. Not all samples carry the same amount of significance and simply assigning equal importance to each of the samples is a naive strategy. In this paper, we propose a method to prioritize samples based on how much we can learn from a sample. We define the learn-ability of a sample as the steady decrease of the training loss associated with this sample over time. We develop an algorithm to prioritize samples with high learn-ability, while assigning lower priority to those that are hard-to-learn, typically caused by noise or stochasticity. We empirically show that across multiple domains our method is more robust than random sampling and also better than just prioritizing with respect to the training loss, i.e. the temporal difference loss, which is used in prioritized experience replay. The code to reproduce our experiments can be found here.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fdcca1e1-b520-4678-8be3-58f2b725bcd4Cited by top-tier papers10
- ExGRPO: Learning to Reason from ExperienceRunzhe Zhan, Yafu Li, Zhi Wang, Xiaoye Qu et al.ICLR 2026 · 51 citations
- Selective Learning for Deep Time Series ForecastingYisong Fu, Zezhi Shao, Chengqing Yu, Yujie Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- REDUCR: Robust Data Downsampling using Class Priority ReweightingWilliam Bankes, George Hughes, Ilija Bogunovic, Zi WangNeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Off-policy Reinforcement Learning with Model-based Exploration AugmentationLikun Wang, Xiangteng Zhang, Yinuo Wang, Guojian Zhan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Looking Backward: Retrospective Backward Synthesis for Goal-Conditioned GFlowNetsHaoran He, Can Chang, Huazhe Xu, Ling PanICLR 2025
Builds on11
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and not yet LearntSören Mindermann, Jan Markus Brauner, Muhammed Razzak, Mrinank Sharma et al.ICML 2022 · 237 citations
- Revisiting Rainbow: Promoting more insightful and inclusive deep reinforcement learning researchJohan S. Obando-Ceron, Pablo Samuel CastroICML 2021 · 125 citations
- DisCor: Corrective Feedback in Reinforcement Learning via Distribution CorrectionAviral Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
- An Equivalence between Loss Functions and Non-Uniform Sampling in Experience ReplayScott Fujimoto, David Meger, Doina PrecupNeurIPS 2020 · 85 citations
Related papers
- Regret Minimization Experience Replay in Off-Policy Reinforcement LearningXu-Hui Liu, Zhenghai Xue, Jing-Cheng Pang, Shengyi Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 51 citations
- Prioritized Level ReplayMinqi Jiang, Edward Grefenstette, Tim RocktäschelICML 2021 · 211 citations
- Reliability-Adjusted Prioritized Experience ReplayLeonard S. Pleiss, Tobias Sutter, Maximilian SchifferICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Large Batch Experience ReplayThibault Lahire, Matthieu Geist, Emmanuel RachelsonICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Learning to Sample with Local and Global Contexts in Experience Replay BufferYoungmin Oh, Kimin Lee, Jinwoo Shin, Eunho Yang et al.ICLR 2021 · 19 citations
