AccessRefinery: Fast Mining Concise Access Control Intents on Public Cloud
Ning Kang, Peng Zhang, Jianyuan Zhang, Hao Li, Dan Wang, Zhenrong Gu, Weibo Lin, Shibiao Jiang, Zhu He, Xu Du, Longfei Chen, Jun Li, Xiaohong Guan
Abstract
Modern cloud applications heavily rely on Identity and Access Management (IAM) services to enforce flexible access control over their data. However, the flexibility comes at a cost: IAM policies are often complex and prone to misconfigurations, leading to risks of data exposure. There is an increasing need to mine a compact set of intents that describe what the policies collectively try to achieve, thereby enabling operators to better understand their policies. However, existing tools on mining access control intent have two limitations: (1) the mining process is slow and even times out on some complex policies; (2) the mined intents are excessive in number and thus still hard to understand. To overcome these, this paper presents AccessRefinery , which can speed up the mining process while reducing the number of intents. The key idea for the speedup is to reduce the redundancy of the multi-round SMT solving, by preprocessing the constraints into bit-vector constraints. For intent reduction, AccessRefinery computes a compact set of intents that can cover the mined intents, by solving a min-set-cover problem. Experiments based on real and synthetic datasets show that AccessRefinery achieves a ∼10–100 × speedup in intent mining, and reduces the number of intents by up to ∼10 ×.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fd9a4c78-7818-43d1-bbbc-6fdc939210ffBuilds on6
- Block public access: trust safety verification of access control policiesMalik Bouchet, Byron Cook, Bryant Cutler, Anna Druzkina et al.FSE 2020 · 25 citations
- Quantifying Permissiveness of Access Control PoliciesWilliam Eiers, Ganesh Sankaran, Albert Li, Emily O'Mahony et al.ICSE 2022 · 15 citations
- Even Faster Conflicts and Lazier Reductions for String SolversAndres Nötzli, Andrew Reynolds, Haniel Barbosa, Clark W. Barrett et al.CAV 2022 · 13 citations
- NDD: A Decision Diagram for Network VerificationZechun Li, Peng Zhang, Yichi Zhang, Hongkun YangNSDI 2025 · 11 citations
- Quantitative Policy Repair for Access Control on the CloudWilliam Eiers, Ganesh Sankaran, Tevfik BultanISSTA 2023 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Relia: Accelerating the Analysis of Cloud Access Control PoliciesDan Wang, Peng Zhang, Zhenrong Gu, Weibo Lin et al.ASE 2025
- Automatically Reducing Privilege for Access Control PoliciesLoris D'Antoni, Shuo Ding, Amit Goel, Mathangi Ramesh et al.OOPSLA 2024 · 11 citations
- Fixing Privilege Escalations in Cloud Access Control with MaxSAT and Graph Neural NetworksYang Hu, Wenxi Wang, Sarfraz Khurshid, Kenneth L. McMillan et al.ASE 2023 · 4 citations
- The Next 700 Policy Miners: A Universal Method for Building Policy MinersCarlos Cotrini, Luca Corinzia, Thilo Weghorn, David A. BasinCCS 2019 · 19 citations
- Automatic Policy Generation for Inter-Service Access Control of MicroservicesXing Li, Yan Chen, Zhiqiang Lin, Xiao Wang et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 64 citations
