Can DPO Learn Diverse Human Values? A Theoretical Scaling Law
Shawn Im, Sharon Li
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities but often struggle to align with human preferences, leading to harmful or undesirable outputs. Preference learning, which trains models to distinguish between preferred and non-preferred responses based on human feedback, has become a crucial component for ensuring that LLMs align with human values. An essential part of ensuring that LLMs are aligned for all people is accounting for a diverse set of values. This paper introduces a new theoretical framework to analyze how generalization scales with value diversity and sample quantity in models trained with direct preference optimization. Our framework rigorously assesses how well models generalize after a finite number of gradient steps, reflecting real-world LLM training practices. By analyzing the reward margin associated with each sample and its trajectory throughout training, we provide a bound on the generalization error that demonstrates the challenges of effectively learning a wide set of concepts or values. These insights are empirically validated on contemporary LLMs, underscoring the practical relevance of our theory.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fd80ffd6-1c06-4c5f-8acb-81056b0fc4d5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?Noam Razin, Yong Lin, Jiarui Yao, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Unintentional Unalignment: Likelihood Displacement in Direct Preference OptimizationNoam Razin, Sadhika Malladi, Adithya Bhaskar, Danqi Chen et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on58
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-DistributionAnanya Kumar, Aditi Raghunathan, Robbie Matthew Jones, Tengyu Ma et al.ICLR 2022 · 911 citations
- Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language ModelsMrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, David Duvenaud et al.ICLR 2024 · 762 citations
Related papers
- Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human FeedbackShawn Im, Yixuan LiICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Leveraging robust optimization for llm alignment under distribution shiftsMingye Zhu, Yi Liu, Zheren Fu, Yongdong Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Larger or Smaller Reward Margins to Select Preferences for LLM Alignment?Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Ziqian Chen, Xue Wang et al.ICML 2025
- RMO: Towards Better LLM Alignment via Reshaping Reward Margin DistributionsYanchi Ru, Yue Huang, Xiangliang ZhangAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
