Lune

CVPR2022Top-tier venue

Does Robustness on ImageNet Transfer to Downstream Tasks?

Yutaro Yamada, Mayu Otani

2022Year
23Citations
8Top-tier citations

Abstract

As clean ImageNet accuracy nears its ceiling, the re-search community is increasingly more concerned about ro-bust accuracy under distributional shifts. While a variety of methods have been proposed to robustify neural networks, these techniques often target models trained on ImageNet classification. At the same time, it is a common practice to use ImageNet pretrained backbones for downstream tasks such as object detection, semantic segmentation, and image classification from different domains. This raises a question: Can these robust image classifiers transfer robustness to downstream tasks? For object detection and semantic segmentation, we find that a vanilla Swin Transformer, a variant of Vision Transformer tailored for dense prediction tasks, transfers robustness better than Convolutional Neu-ral Networks that are trained to be robust to the corrupted version of ImageNet. For CIFAR10 classification, we find that models that are robustified for ImageNet do not re-tain robustness when fully fine-tuned. These findings sug-gest that current robustification techniques tend to empha-size ImageNet evaluations. Moreover, network architecture is a strong source of robustness when we consider transfer learning.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext fd54b3a8-b8e2-4633-a763-4ee9efd9ca81

Cited by top-tier papers8

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on15

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines