ValidaTor: Domain Validation over Tor
Jens Frieß, Haya Schulmann, Michael Waidner
Abstract
Domain Validation (DV) is the primary method used by Certificate Authorities (CAs) to confirm administrative control over a domain before issuing digital certificates. Despite its widespread use, DV is vulnerable to various attacks, prompting the adoption of multiple vantage points to enhance security, such as the state of the art DV mechanism supported by Let's Encrypt. However, even distributed static vantage points remain susceptible to targeted attacks. In this paper we introduce ValidaTor, an HTTP-based domain validation system that leverages the Tor network to create a distributed and unpredictable set of validators. By utilizing Tor's exit nodes, ValidaTor significantly increases the pool of available validators, providing high path diversity and resilience against strong adversaries.
Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that ValidaTor can achieve the validation throughput of a commercial CA and has the potential to scale to a validation volume comparable to Let's Encrypt, while using minimal dedicated infrastructure and only a small fraction ( 0.1%) of Tor's remaining available bandwidth. While unpredictable selection of validators makes ValidaTor fully resistant to targeted attacks on validators, we also show the use of Tor nodes improves path diversity and thereby the resilience of DV to subversion by well-positioned ASes, reducing the number of Autonomous Systems (ASes) capable of issuing fraudulent certificates by up to 27% compared to Let's Encrypt. Lastly, we show that the chance of subversion by malicious, colluding exit nodes is negligible (≤ 1% even with a quarter of existing exit nodes).
We make the code of ValidaTor as well as the datasets and measurements publicly available for use, reproduction, and future research. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fd423b59-0e66-4d89-bc69-ccb806b308d4Builds on8
- Tranco: A Research-Oriented Top Sites Ranking Hardened Against ManipulationVictor Le Pochat, Tom van Goethem, Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Maciej Korczynski et al.NDSS 2019 · 826 citations
- Bamboozling Certificate Authorities with BGPHenry Birge-Lee, Yixin Sun, Anne Edmundson, Jennifer Rexford et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 83 citations
- Domain Validation++ For MitM-Resilient PKIMarkus Brandt, Tianxiang Dai, Amit Klein, Haya Schulmann et al.CCS 2018 · 71 citations
- Identifying and Characterizing Sybils in the Tor NetworkPhilipp Winter, Roya Ensafi, Karsten Loesing, Nick FeamsterUSENIX Security 2016 · 53 citations
- SICO: Surgical Interception Attacks by Manipulating BGP CommunitiesHenry Birge-Lee, Liang Wang, Jennifer Rexford, Prateek MittalCCS 2019 · 51 citations
Related papers
- Let's Downgrade Let's EncryptTianxiang Dai, Haya Schulmann, Michael WaidnerCCS 2021 · 16 citations
- Experiences Deploying Multi-Vantage-Point Domain Validation at Let's EncryptHenry Birge-Lee, Liang Wang, Daniel McCarney, Roland Shoemaker et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 23 citations
- How Effective is Multiple-Vantage-Point Domain Control Validation?Grace H. Cimaszewski, Henry Birge-Lee, Liang Wang, Jennifer Rexford et al.USENIX Security 2023
- ACME++: A Secure Authorization Mechanism for ACME Clients in the Web PKI EcosystemTianyu Zhang, Han Zhang, Yunze Wei, Yahui Li et al.WWW 2025
- Byzantine-Secure Relying Party for Resilient RPKIJens Frieß, Donika Mirdita, Haya Schulmann, Michael WaidnerCCS 2024 · 1 citation
