Any-Depth Alignment: Unlocking Innate Safety Alignment of LLMs to Any-Depth
Jiawei Zhang, Andrew Estornell, David D. Baek, Bo Li, Xiaojun Xu
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong but shallow alignment: they directly refuse harmful queries when a refusal is expected at the very start of an assistant turn, yet this protection collapses once a harmful continuation is underway (either through the adversarial attacks or via harmful assistant-prefill attacks). This raises a fundamental question: Can the innate shallow alignment in LLMs be unlocked to ensure safety at arbitrary generation depths? To achieve this goal, we propose Any-Depth Alignment (ADA), an effective inference-time defense with negligible overhead. ADA is built based on our observation that alignment is concentrated in the assistant header tokens through repeated use in shallow-refusal training, and these tokens possess the model's strong alignment priors. By reintroducing these tokens mid-stream, ADA induces the model to reassess harmfulness and recover refusals at any point in generation. Across diverse open-source model families (Llama, Gemma, Mistral, Qwen, DeepSeek, and gpt-oss), ADA achieves robust safety performance without requiring any changes to the base model's parameters. It secures a near-100% refusal rate against challenging adversarial prefill attacks ranging from dozens to thousands of tokens. Furthermore, ADA reduces the average success rate of prominent adversarial prompt attacks (such as GCG, AutoDAN, PAIR, and TAP) to below 3%. This is all accomplished while preserving utility on benign tasks with minimal over-refusal. ADA maintains this resilience even after the base model undergoes subsequent instruction tuning (benign or adversarial).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
Related papers
- A2D: Any-Order, Any-Step Safety Alignment for Diffusion Language ModelsWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Yoonjun Cho, Dongjae Jeon et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Safety Alignment Can Be Not Superficial With Explicit Safety SignalsJianwei Li, Jung-Eun KimICML 2025
- SAFEPATH: Preventing Harmful Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought via Early AlignmentWonje Jeung, Sangyeon Yoon, Minsuk Kahng, Albert NoNeurIPS 2025 · 31 citations
- No, of Course I Can! Deeper Fine-Tuning Attacks That Bypass Token-Level Safety MechanismsJoshua Kazdan, Abhay Puri, Rylan Schaeffer, Lisa Yu et al.ICLR 2026
- Safety Alignment Should be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens DeepXiangyu Qi, Ashwinee Panda, Kaifeng Lyu, Xiao Ma et al.ICLR 2025
