Mitigating Privacy Risk in Membership Inference by Convex-Concave Loss
Zhenlong Liu, Lei Feng, Huiping Zhuang, Xiaofeng Cao, Hongxin Wei
Abstract
Machine learning models are susceptible to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether a sample is in the training set. Existing work utilizes gradient ascent to enlarge the loss variance of training data, alleviating the privacy risk. However, optimizing toward a reverse direction may cause the model parameters to oscillate near local minima, leading to instability and suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose a novel method -Convex-Concave Loss (CCL), which enables a high variance of training loss distribution by gradient descent. Our method is motivated by the theoretical analysis that convex losses tend to decrease the loss variance during training. Thus, our key idea behind CCL is to reduce the convexity of loss functions with a concave term. Trained with CCL, neural networks produce losses with high variance for training data, reinforcing the defense against MIAs. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of CCL, achieving a state-of-the-art balance in the privacy-utility trade-off.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fd1bdf14-1aee-440a-a19c-5cba640ec0adCited by top-tier papers3
- How does Bayesian Sampling help Membership Inference Attacks?Zhenlong Liu, Wenyu Jiang, Feng Zhou, Hongxin WeiICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Membership Privacy Risks of Sharpness Aware MinimizationYoung In Kim, Andrea Agiollo, Pratiksha Agrawal, Johannes O. Royset et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Learnability and Privacy Vulnerability are Entangled in a Few Critical WeightsXingli Fang, Jung-Eun KimICLR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on26
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning ModelsAhmed Salem, Yang Zhang, Mathias Humbert, Pascal Berrang et al.NDSS 2019 · 1,141 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks From First PrinciplesNicholas Carlini, Steve Chien, Milad Nasr, Shuang Song et al.S&P 2022 · 1,049 citations
- Label-Only Membership Inference AttacksChristopher A. Choquette-Choo, Florian Tramèr, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas PapernotICML 2021 · 628 citations
Related papers
- RelaxLoss: Defending Membership Inference Attacks without Losing UtilityDingfan Chen, Ning Yu, Mario FritzICLR 2022 · 61 citations
- Overconfidence is a Dangerous Thing: Mitigating Membership Inference Attacks by Enforcing Less Confident PredictionZitao Chen, Karthik PattabiramanNDSS 2024
- Curvature Clues: Decoding Deep Learning Privacy with Input Loss CurvatureDeepak Ravikumar, Efstathia Soufleri, Kaushik RoyNeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations
- When Does Data Augmentation Help With Membership Inference Attacks?Yigitcan Kaya, Tudor DumitrasICML 2021 · 82 citations
- Machine Learning with Membership Privacy using Adversarial RegularizationMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrCCS 2018 · 543 citations
