Removing Cost Volumes from Optical Flow Estimators
Simon Kiefhaber, Stefan Roth, Simone Schaub-Meyer
Abstract
https://visinf.github.io/recover Overlayed input images SEA-RAFT [52] ReCoVEr-CX (ours) PWC-Net [47, 48] ReCoVEr-MN (ours) inference: 169ms 8.22GB inference: 144ms 1.24GB inference: 43ms 1.25GB inference: 50ms 0.49GB Overlayed input images SEA-RAFT [52] inference: 169ms 8.22GB ages SEA-RAFT [52] ReCoVEr-CX (our inference: 169ms 8.22GB inference A-RAFT [52] ReCoVEr-CX (ours) PWCinference: 169ms 8.22GB inference: 144ms 1.24GB ReCoVEr-CX (ours) PWC-Net [47, 48] inference: 144ms 1.24GB inference: 43ms 1.25GB urs) PWC-Net [47, 48] ReCoVEr-MN (our ce: 144ms 1.24GB inference: 43ms 1.25GB inferenc Overlayed input images SEA-RAFT [52] inference: 169ms 8.22GB images SEA-RAFT [52] ReCoVEr-CX (ou inference: 169ms 8.22GB inferenc EA-RAFT [52] ReCoVEr-CX (ours) PWC inference: 169ms 8.22GB inference: 144ms 1.24GB ReCoVEr-CX (ours) PWC-Net [47, 48] inference: 144ms 1.24GB inference: 43ms 1.25GB ours) PWC-Net [47, 48] ReCoVEr-MN (ou nce: 144ms 1.24GB inference: 43ms 1.25GB inferen Figure 1. ReCoVEr. We propose a method to remove cost volumes from optical flow estimators during training, and thereby, we are able to create fast and accurate optical flow estimators with a significantly reduced memory footprint. Our most accurate model, ReCoVEr-CX, reaches state-of-the-art accuracy while being more efficient w.r.t. inference and memory than SEA-RAFT [52]. Our most efficient model, ReCoVEr-MN, predicts sharper motion boundaries compared to the popular PWC-Net [47, 48], while having comparable efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fd10e301-8fc4-4246-abc2-83bb047f32d4Cited by top-tier papers2
- CoWTracker: Tracking by Warping instead of CorrelationZihang Lai, Eldar Insafutdinov, Edgar Sucar, Andrea VedaldiCVPR 2026 · 12 citations
- Efficient All-Pairs Correlation Volume Sampling for Optical Flow EstimationKarlis Martins Briedis, Markus Gross, Christopher SchroersCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on18
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Searching for MobileNetV3Andrew Howard, Ruoming Pang, Hartwig Adam, Quoc V. Le et al.ICCV 2019 · 9,163 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Learning to Estimate Hidden Motions with Global Motion AggregationShihao Jiang, Dylan Campbell, Yao Lu, Hongdong Li et al.ICCV 2021 · 402 citations
- GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global MatchingHaofei Xu, Jing Zhang, Jianfei Cai, Hamid Rezatofighi et al.CVPR 2022 · 353 citations
Related papers
- WAFT: Warping-Alone Field Transforms for Optical FlowYihan Wang, Jia DengICLR 2026 · 36 citations
- Hybrid Cost Volume for Memory-Efficient Optical FlowYang Zhao, Gangwei Xu, Gang WuACM MM 2024 · 1 citation
- MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow EstimationVladislav Bargatin, Egor Chistov, Alexander Yakovenko, Dmitriy S. VatolinICCV 2025 · 11 citations
- Deep Equilibrium Optical Flow EstimationShaojie Bai, Zhengyang Geng, Yash Savani, J. Zico KolterCVPR 2022 · 45 citations
- Global Matching with Overlapping Attention for Optical Flow EstimationShiyu Zhao, Long Zhao, Zhixing Zhang, Enyu Zhou et al.CVPR 2022 · 85 citations
