Ads that Talk Back: Implications and Perceptions of Injecting Personalized Advertising into LLM Chatbots
Brian Jay Tang, Kaiwen Sun, Noah T. Curran, Florian Schaub, Kang G. Shin
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled the creation of highly effective chatbots. However, the compute costs of widely deploying LLMs have raised questions about profitability. Companies have proposed exploring ad-based revenue streams for monetizing LLMs, which could serve as the new de facto platform for advertising. This paper investigates the implications of personalizing LLM advertisements to individual users via a between-subjects experiment with 179 participants. We developed a chatbot that embeds personalized product advertisements within LLM responses, inspired by similar forays by AI companies. The evaluation of our benchmarks showed that ad injection only slightly impacted LLM performance, particularly response desirability. Results revealed that participants struggled to detect ads, and even preferred LLM responses with hidden advertisements. Rather than clicking on our advertising disclosure, participants tried changing their advertising settings using natural language queries. We created an advertising dataset and an open-source LLM, Phi-4-Ads, fine-tuned to serve ads and flexibly adapt to user preferences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fcf155b8-2e11-490d-b3c3-7d06b071939bBuilds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
Related papers
- A Large-Scale Study of Personalized Phishing using Large Language ModelsStefan Czybik, Anne Josiane Kouam, Peter Heubl, Jan Magnus Nold et al.USENIX Security 2026 · 1 citation
- Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPTLeon Hannig, Annika Bush, Meltem Aksoy, Tim Trappen et al.CHI 2026
- Language Models can Subtly Deceive Without Lying: A Case Study on Strategic Phrasing in LegislationAtharvan Dogra, Krishna Pillutla, Ameet Deshpande, Ananya B. Sai et al.ACL 2025
- Do LLMs Recognize Your Preferences? Evaluating Personalized Preference Following in LLMsSiyan Zhao, Mingyi Hong, Yang Liu, Devamanyu Hazarika et al.ICLR 2025
- Malicious LLM-Based Conversational AI Makes Users Reveal Personal InformationXiao Zhan, Juan Carlos Carrillo, William Seymour, Jose SuchUSENIX Security 2025
