Lune

ACL Findings2026

RubRIX: Rubric-Driven Risk Mitigation in Caregiver-AI Interactions

Drishti Goel, Jeongah Lee, Qiuyue Joy Zhong, Violeta J. Rodriguez, Daniel S. Brown, Ravi Karkar, Dong Whi Yoo, Koustuv Saha

Abstract

Caregivers seeking AI-mediated support express complex needs-information-seeking, emotional validation, and distress cues-that warrant careful evaluation of response safety and appropriateness. Existing AI evaluation frameworks, primarily focused on general risks (toxicity, hallucinations, policy violations, etc) may not adequately capture the nuanced risks of LLM-responses in caregiving-contexts. We introduce RubRIX (Rubric-based Risk Index), a theory-driven, clinician-validated framework for evaluating risks in LLM caregiving responses. Grounded in the Elements of an Ethic of Care, RubRIX operationalizes five empirically-derived risk dimensions: Inattention, Bias & Stigma, Information Inaccuracy, Uncritical Affirmation, and Epistemic Arrogance. We evaluate six state-of-the-art LLMs on over 20,000 caregiver queries from Reddit and ALZConnected. Rubric-guided refinement consistently reduced risk-components by 45-98% after one iteration across models. This work contributes a methodological approach for developing domain-sensitive, user-centered evaluation frameworks for high-burden contexts. Our findings highlight the importance of domain-sensitive, interactional risk evaluation for the responsible deployment of LLMs in caregiving support contexts. We release benchmark datasets to enable future research on contextual risk evaluation in AI-mediated support.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on5

  1. RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language ModelsSamuel Gehman, Suchin Gururangan, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi et al.EMNLP Findings 2020 · 692 citations
  2. Mental-LLM: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text DataXuhai Xu, Bingsheng Yao, Yuanzhe Dong, Saadia Gabriel et al.UbiComp 2024 · 281 citations
  3. Red Teaming Language Models with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Saffron Huang, H. Francis Song, Trevor Cai et al.EMNLP 2022 · 239 citations
  4. Towards Facilitating Empathic Conversations in Online Mental Health Support: A Reinforcement Learning ApproachAshish Sharma, Inna W. Lin, Adam S. Miner, David C. Atkins et al.WWW 2021 · 183 citations
  5. Mental Health Coping Stories on Social Media: A Causal-Inference Study of Papageno EffectYunhao Yuan, Koustuv Saha, Barbara Keller, Erkki Tapio Isometsä et al.WWW 2023 · 29 citations

Related papers

  1. One Question, Four Voices: How Advice for Alzheimer's Caregiving Differs Between Caregivers, Clinicians, and Large Language ModelsCongning Ni, Jinkyung Katie Park, Yang Li, Sarvech Qadir et al.CSCW 2026
  2. "Words are not enough": Examining Emotional Support by Conversational AI for CaregiversMelika Vafafar, Sian Joel-Edgar, Casper Harteveld, Hossein Dabbagh et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
  3. Like a Therapist, But Not: Reddit Narratives of AI in Mental Health ContextsElham Aghakhani, Rezvaneh RezapourACL Findings 2026
  4. GrandGuard: Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Safeguards for Elderly-Chatbot Interaction SafetyChangxuan Fan, Xi Yang, Yueyuan Zheng, Bin Zhou et al.ACL Findings 2026
  5. Persona-Grounded Safety Evaluation of AI Companions in Multi-Turn ConversationsPrerna Juneja, Lika LomidzeACL 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines