DAGPrompT: Pushing the Limits of Graph Prompting with a Distribution-aware Graph Prompt Tuning Approach
Qin Chen, Liang Wang, Bo Zheng, Guojie Song
Abstract
The "pre-train then fine-tune" approach has advanced GNNs by enabling general knowledge capture without task-specific labels. However, an objective gap between pre-training and downstream tasks limits its effectiveness. Recent graph prompting methods aim to close this gap through task reformulations and learnable prompts. Despite this, they struggle with complex graphs like heterophily graphs. Freezing the GNN encoder can reduce the impact of prompting, while simple prompts fail to handle diverse hop-level distributions. This paper identifies two key challenges in adapting graph prompting methods for complex graphs: (i) adapting the model to new distributions in downstream tasks to mitigate pre-training and fine-tuning discrepancies from heterophily and (ii) customizing prompts for hop-specific node requirements. To overcome these challenges, we propose Distribution-aware Graph Prompt Tuning (DAGPrompT), which integrates a GLoRA module for optimizing the GNN encoder's projection matrix and message-passing schema through low-rank adaptation. DAGPrompT also incorporates hopspecific prompts accounting for varying graph structures and distributions among hops. Evaluations on 10 datasets and 14 baselines demonstrate that DAGPrompT improves accuracy by up to 4.79% in node and graph classification tasks, setting a new state-of-the-art while preserving efficiency. Codes are available at GitHub. CCS Concepts • Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms; • Computing methodologies → Neural networks; Supervised learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fcba6bc6-53b9-43c5-b06b-c73ccd65149dCited by top-tier papers2
- Beyond Single-Granularity Prompts: A Multi-Scale Chain-of-Thought Prompt Learning for GraphZiyu Zheng, Yaming Yang, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao et al.WWW 2026 · 1 citation
- PAGPL: Privacy-Aware Graph Prompt Learning Scheme via Adaptive Perturbation-Estimated Topology RecoveryJu Jia, Jiansen Song, Jingxuan Yu, Jiabao Guo et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on31
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
Related papers
- GraphTOP: Graph Topology-Oriented Prompting for Graph Neural NetworksXingbo Fu, Zhenyu Lei, Zihan Chen, Binchi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- DiP-G: Discrete Prompting for Graph Neural NetworksYumeng Zhao, Huiying Hu, Steve Wen, Junjie Shen et al.ICML 2026
- GraphPrompt: Unifying Pre-Training and Downstream Tasks for Graph Neural NetworksZemin Liu, Xingtong Yu, Yuan Fang, Xinming ZhangWWW 2023 · 263 citations
- Universal Prompt Tuning for Graph Neural NetworksTaoran Fang, Yunchao Zhang, Yang Yang, Chunping Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 166 citations
- HePa: Heterogeneous Graph Prompting for All-Level Classification TasksJia Jinghong, Lei Song, Jiaxing Li, Youyong KongAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
